Does Rotation and Anterior Translation Persist as Residual Instability in the Knee after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? (Evaluation of Coronal Lateral Collateral Ligament Sign, Tibial Rotation, and Translation Measurements in Postoperative MRI)

被引:1
作者
Karatekin, Yavuz Selim [1 ]
Altinayak, Harun [1 ]
Kehribar, Lokman [2 ]
Yilmaz, Ali Kerim [3 ]
Korkmaz, Esra [3 ]
Anil, Berna [3 ]
机构
[1] Samsun Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, TR-55090 Samsun, Turkiye
[2] Samsun Univ, Med Fac, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, TR-55090 Samsun, Turkiye
[3] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Yasar Dogu Sport Sci, TR-55090 Samsun, Turkiye
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 11期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; ACL reconstruction; internal rotation; anterior translation; coronal LCL sign; static instability; SECONDARY SIGN; ARTHROMETRIC EVALUATION; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; KINEMATICS; DIAGNOSIS; RUPTURE; LAXITY; TEARS;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59111930
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of residual instability in the knee after ACL reconstruction through the analysis of MRI findings. Methods: This study included patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction between December 2019 and December 2021, and had preoperative and postoperative MRI, clinical scores, and postoperative isokinetic measurements. The anterior tibial translation (ATT) distance, coronal lateral collateral ligament (LCL) sign, and femorotibial rotation (FTR) angle were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. The correlation between the changes in preoperative-postoperative measurements and postoperative measurements with clinical scores and isokinetic measurements was examined. The clinical outcomes were compared based on the presence of a postoperative coronal LCL sign. Inclusion criteria were set as follows: the time between the ACL rupture and surgery being 6 months, availability of preoperative and postoperative clinical scores, and objective determination of muscle strength using isokinetic dynamometer device measurements. Patients with a history of previous knee surgery, additional ligament injuries other than the ACL, evidence of osteoarthritis on direct radiographs, cartilage injuries lower limb deformities, and contralateral knee injuries were excluded from this study. Results: This study included 32 patients. After ACL reconstruction, there were no significant changes in the ATT distance (preoperatively: 6.5 +/- 3.9 mm, postoperatively: 5.7 +/- 3.2 mm) and FTR angle (preoperatively: 5.4 degrees +/- 2.9, postoperatively: 5.2 degrees +/- 3.5) compared to the preoperative measurements (p > 0.05). The clinical measurements were compared based on the presence of a postoperative coronal LCL sign (observed in 17 patients, not observed in 15 patients), and no significant differences were found for all parameters (p > 0.05). There were no observed correlations between postoperative FTR angle, postoperative ATT distance, FTR angle change, and ATT distance change values with postoperative clinical scores (p > 0.05). Significant correlations were observed between the high strength ratios generated at an angular velocity of 60 degrees and a parameters FTR angle and ATT distance (p-values: 0.028, 0.019, and r-values: -0.389, -0.413, respectively). Conclusions: Despite undergoing ACL reconstruction, no significant changes were observed in the indirect MRI findings (ATT distance, coronal LCL sign, and FTR angle). These results suggest that postoperative residual tibiofemoral rotation and tibial anterior translation may persist; however, they do not seem to have a direct impact on clinical scores. Furthermore, the increase in tibial translation and rotation could potentially negatively affect the flexion torque compared to the extension torque in movements requiring high torque at low angular velocities.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Arneja S, 2009, J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), V17, P77
  • [2] ARTHROMETRIC EVALUATION OF KNEES THAT HAVE A TORN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT
    BACH, BR
    WARREN, RF
    FLYNN, WM
    KROLL, M
    WICKIEWIECZ, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (09) : 1299 - 1306
  • [3] Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A meta-analysis
    Benjammse, A
    Gokeler, A
    van der Schans, CP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 36 (05) : 267 - 288
  • [4] Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -: Pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies
    Brandsson, S
    Karlsson, J
    Swärd, L
    Kartus, J
    Eriksson, BI
    Kärrholm, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (03) : 361 - 367
  • [5] MR DIAGNOSIS OF COMPLETE TEARS OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT OF THE KNEE - IMPORTANCE OF ANTERIOR SUBLUXATION OF THE TIBIA
    CHAN, WP
    PETERFY, C
    FRITZ, RC
    GENANT, HK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (02) : 355 - 360
  • [6] Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads
    Gabriel, MT
    Wong, EK
    Woo, SLY
    Yagi, M
    Debski, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2004, 22 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [7] The Rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000
    Ganko, A
    Engebretsen, L
    Ozer, H
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2000, 8 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [8] Post-Operative Modified All-Inside ACL Reconstruction Technique's Clinical Outcomes and Isokinetic Strength Assessments
    Genc, Ahmet Serhat
    Guzel, Nizamettin
    Yilmaz, Ali Kerim
    Ermis, Egemen
    Kurtca, Mine Pekesen
    Agar, Anil
    Ceritoglu, Kubilay Ugurcan
    Yasul, Yavuz
    Eseoglu, Ismail
    Kehribar, Lokman
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (17)
  • [9] The predictive value of intraoperative KT-1000 arthrometer measurements in single incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Giannotti, BF
    Fanelli, GC
    Barrett, TA
    Edson, C
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (06): : 660 - 666
  • [10] Guenoun D, 2012, Diagn Interv Imaging, V93, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.diii.2012.02.003