Ecodesign and Operational Strategies to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of MRI for Energy Cost Savings

被引:36
作者
Woolen, Sean A. [1 ]
Becker, Amy E. [1 ]
Martin, Alastair J. [1 ]
Knoerl, Roland [2 ]
Lam, Vincent [3 ]
Folsom, Jerry [4 ]
Eusemann, Christian [5 ]
Hess, Christopher P. [1 ]
Deshpande, Vibhas [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Siemens Smart Infrastructure, Fremont, CA USA
[4] Siemens Smart Infrastructure, Austin, TX USA
[5] Siemens Healthineers, Malvern, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.230441
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Radiology is a major contributor to health care's climate footprint due to energy-intensive devices, particularly MRI, which uses the most energy.Purpose: To determine the energy, cost, and carbon savings that could be achieved through different scanner power management strategies.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective evaluation, four outpatient MRI scanners from three vendors were individually equipped with power meters (1-Hz sampling rate). Power measurement logs were extracted for 39 days. Data were segmented into off, idle, prepared-to-scan, scan, or power-save modes for each scanner. Energy, cost (assuming a mean cost of $0.14 per kilowatt hour), and carbon savings were calculated for the lowest scanner activity modes. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and 95% CIs. Results: Projected annual energy consumption per scanner ranged from 82.7 to 171.1 MW-hours, with 72%-91% defined as nonproductive. Power draws for each mode were measured as 6.4 kW & PLUSMN; 0.1 (SD; power-save mode), 7.3 kW & PLUSMN; 0.6 to 9.7 kW & PLUSMN; 0.2 (off), 9.5 kW & PLUSMN; 0.9 to 14.5 kW & PLUSMN; 0.5 (idle), 17.3 kW & PLUSMN; 0.5 to 25.6 kW & PLUSMN; 0.6 (prepared-to-scan mode), and 28.6 kW & PLUSMN; 8.6 to 48.3 kW & PLUSMN; 11.8 (scan mode). Switching MRI units from idle to off mode for 12 hours overnight reduced power consumption by 25%-33%, translating to a potential annual savings of 12.3-21.0 MW-hours, $1717-$2943, and 8.7-14.9 metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent (MTCO2eq). The power-save mode further reduced consumption by 22%-28% compared with off mode, potentially saving an additional 8.8-11.4 MW-hours, $1226-$1594, and 6.2-8.1 MTCO2eq per year for 12 hours overnight. Implementation of a power-save mode for 12 hours overnight in all outpatient MRI units in the United States could save U.S. health care 58 863.2-76 288.2 MW-hours, $8.2-$10.7 million, and 41 606.4-54 088.3 MTCO2eq. Conclusion: Powering down MRI units made radiology departments more energy efficient and showed substantial sustainability and cost benefits.& COPY; RSNA, 2023
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GLOB EN CRIS EN CRIS
  • [2] [Anonymous], How much electricity does an American home use
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, SELF REG IN EC MED I
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, MAGNETIC RESONANCE I
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2022, US QUICK FACTS POP E
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, AVERT US NATL WEIGHT
  • [7] [Anonymous], GREENH GAS EQ CALC C
  • [8] Brown M, RADIOLOGY JUST ACCEP
  • [9] Environmental impact reduction as a new dimension for quality measurement of healthcare services: The case of magnetic resonance imaging
    Esmaeili, Amin
    McGuire, Charles
    Overcash, Michael
    Ali, Kamran
    Soltani, Seyed
    Twomey, Janet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 31 (08) : 910 - 922
  • [10] The Energy Consumption of Radiology: Energy- and Cost-saving Opportunities for CT and MRI Operation
    Heye, Tobias
    Knoerl, Roland
    Wehrle, Thomas
    Mangold, Daniel
    Cerminara, Alessandro
    Loser, Michael
    Plumeyer, Martin
    Degen, Markus
    Luethy, Rahel
    Brodbeck, Dominique
    Merkle, Elmar
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 295 (03) : 593 - 605