Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis

被引:2
作者
Li, Yi [1 ]
Spradling, Kyle [2 ]
Allen, Isabel Elaine [3 ]
Conti, Simon [2 ]
Hampson, Lindsay A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
didactics; trainee preferences; resident education; collaborative learning; conjoint analysis;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2023.1144092
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeDidactic lectures are a commonly used educational tool during urology residency training. Recently, there has been a rapid introduction of online, collaborative didactics as a new model for resident teaching. The aim of this study is to determine which attributes of didactics education are most preferred by contemporary urology trainees. MethodsUrology trainees were invited to complete an online choice-based exercise assessing combinations of four attributes associated with didactics education: mode of communication, learning style, presenter credentials, and curriculum design. The survey was distributed via social media platforms and the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics (COViD) website. A choice-based conjoint analysis was used to identify how the trainees valued different combinations of didactic education. ResultsSeventy-three trainees completed the conjoint analysis exercise. Mode of communication was rated as significantly more important than curriculum design (relative importance 28.6% vs. 19.9%). Overall, the majority preferred online/virtual presentations to in-person presentations. Respondents preferred national experts to faculty members from their local institutions, and preferred cased based lectures to didactics style lectures. A nationally standardized curriculum was also preferred over curriculum designed by local institutions. Finally, when segmented by level of training, there was increased preference for overall favored options as PGY year increased. ConclusionThis conjoint analysis shows clear preference by trainees for online, recorded didactics, nationally standardized with national experts, and preferably in a case-based format. Academic societies in urology and program directors should consider utilizing the shared experience of previously created collaborative online lectures in developing future didactic curriculum that can meet the needs of current trainees.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology residency training in Italy
    Amparore, Daniele
    Claps, Francesco
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Esperto, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Liguori, Giovanni
    Serni, Sergio
    Trombetta, Carlo
    Carini, Marco
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Campi, Riccardo
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (04) : 505 - 509
  • [2] Anon: Society of Academic Urologists, COVID 19 BEST PRACT
  • [3] Green P.E., 2004, BT - Marketing Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects: A Tribute, P117, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-28692-16, 10.1007/978-0-387-28692-16]
  • [4] Lecture Evaluations by Medical Students: Concepts That Correlate With Scores
    Jen, Aaron
    Webb, Emily M.
    Ahearn, Bren
    Naeger, David M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [5] Online Collaborative Learning in Urology
    Li, Yi
    Kern, Nora G.
    Conti, Simon L.
    Hampson, Lindsay A.
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 22 (12)
  • [6] CASE-based and Guidelines-based Lectures are the Most Preferred Form of Online Webinar Education: Results from the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics Series (COViD)
    Li, Yi
    de la Calle, Claire
    Chu, Carissa
    Baussan, Caitlin
    Hampson, Lindsay A.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2021, 158 : 52 - 56
  • [7] Multi-Institutional Collaborative Resident Education in the Era of COVID-19
    Li, Yi
    Chu, Carissa
    de la Calle, Claire M.
    Baussan, Caitlin
    Ambani, Sapan N.
    Borofsky, Michael S.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    Conti, Simon L.
    Hagedorn, Judith C.
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    Kern, Nora G.
    Kielb, Stephanie J.
    Schenkman, Noah S.
    Sorensen, Mathew D.
    Yang, Jennifer H.
    Hampson, Lindsay A.
    [J]. UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2020, 7 (05) : 425 - 433
  • [8] Heterogeneity in urology teaching curricula among Canadian urology residency programs
    Mann, Uday
    Ramjiawan, Ryan
    Nayak, Jasmir G.
    Patel, Premal
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (01): : E41 - E47
  • [9] MedCalc Software Ltd, COMP PROP CALC
  • [10] Evaluation of a Case-based Urology Learning Program
    Mishra, Kirtishri
    Snow-Lisy, Devon C.
    Ross, Jonathan
    Goldfarb, David A.
    Goldman, Howard
    Campbell, Steven C.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (06) : 1207 - 1210