Trust and robotics: a multi-staged decision-making approach to robots in community

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Wenxi [1 ]
Wong, Willow [1 ]
Findlay, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Management Univ, Ctr AI & Data Governance, Yong Pung Sch Law, Singapore, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Social robots; Acceptability and trust; Design and human factors; Ethics and governance declarations; PROSPECT-THEORY; SOCIAL ROBOTS; AUTOMATION; ANTHROPOMORPHISM; METAANALYSIS; CHALLENGES; ECONOMICS; EMOTION; SYSTEMS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-023-01705-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the desired outcome of social good within the wider robotics ecosystem, trust is identified as the central adhesive of the human-robot interaction (HRI) interface. However, building trust between humans and robots involves more than improving the machine's technical reliability or trustworthiness in function. This paper presents a holistic, community-based approach to trust-building, where trust is understood as a multifaceted and multi-staged looped relation that depends heavily on context and human perceptions. Building on past literature that identifies dispositional and learned stages of trust, our proposed decision to trust model considers more extensively the human and situational factors influencing how trust manifests within social relations. Priority is given to the human user of technology-the initiator of human-robot trust relations-at all stages of decision-making. The envisioned formation of optimal conditions in which trust emerges requires the collective participation of practitioners, policymakers, and members of the community. With trust facilitating the smooth transition of robots into more socially embedded roles, positive receptivity of the best engineering project arises from the presence of harmonious robot-human trust relations in community spaces.
引用
收藏
页码:2463 / 2478
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EMOTIONAL ASPECTS OF DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: THERMODYNAMIC APPROACH
    Pakhomov, A. P.
    Sudjin, N. E.
    EKSPERIMENTALNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA, 2013, 6 (03): : 31 - 52
  • [32] A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on Regret Theory
    Xia, Meimei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (07) : 2135 - 2143
  • [33] Technological maturity of the OECD countries: A multi-criteria decision-making approach using PROMETHEE
    Balkan, Dursun
    Akyuz, Goknur Arzu
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [34] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Siting Sewer Treatment Plants in Muscat, Oman
    Al Nasiri, Noura
    Al Fazari, Abdullah
    Ali, Waad
    Agyekum, Boadi
    Ramadan, Elnazir
    URBAN SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (03)
  • [35] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Energy Storage Technology Selection Based on Demand
    Qie, Xiaotong
    Zhang, Rui
    Hu, Yanyong
    Sun, Xialing
    Chen, Xue
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (20)
  • [36] Making an Opportunity Out of a Crisis: The Inclusive Approach of the Italian Robotics Community
    Sciutti, Alessandra
    Battaglia, Fiorella
    Fossati, Maria Rosanna
    Calderai, Valentina
    Catalano, Manuel Giuseppe
    Antonelli, Gianluca
    Di Nunzio, Giorgio Maria
    Dubbini, Nevio
    Giarre, Laura
    Menegatti, Emanuele
    Negrello, Francesca
    Pascucci, Federica
    Pivetti, Monica
    Zanchettin, Andrea Maria
    Baroncelli, Arturo
    Majorana, Salvatore
    Marchisio, Carlo
    Siciliano, Bruno
    Rocco, Paolo
    Metta, Giorgio
    Melchiorri, Claudio
    Laschi, Cecilia
    Guglielmelli, Eugenio
    De Luca, Alessandro
    Dario, Paolo
    Bicchi, Antonio
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2021, 28 (04) : 79 - 91
  • [37] Trust in Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems in Health: A Comparison Between ADA Health and IBM Watson Oncology
    Martens, Marijn
    De Wolf, Ralf
    De Marez, Lieven
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE, 2024, 18 (01):
  • [38] REASON AND EMOTION IN HUMAN DECISION-MAKING: A PARETIAN APPROACH
    Pugliesi, Marcio
    Brandao, Andre Martins
    QUAESTIO IURIS, 2016, 9 (04): : 2150 - 2165
  • [39] Variations in decision-making profiles by age and gender: A cluster-analytic approach
    Delaney, Rebecca
    Strough, JoNell
    Parker, Andrew M.
    de Bruin, Wandi Bruine
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 85 : 19 - 24
  • [40] Relationships, trust, decision-making and quality of care in a paediatric intensive care unit
    Vivian, Lauraine
    Marais, Adele
    McLaughlin, Sean
    Falkenstein, Sandra
    Argent, Andrew
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 (09) : 1593 - 1598