Capacity reduction on urban main roads: How truck drivers adapted, and what effects and consequences they experienced

被引:1
作者
Caspersen, Elise [1 ]
Orving, Tale [1 ]
Tennoy, Aud [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Transport Econ, Dept Technol, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Freight transport; Truck drivers; Capacity reduction; Sustainable mobility; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; POLICY; INFRASTRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Urban freight transport is an important issue in sustainable mobility discussions. It constitutes a significant proportion of urban traffic, and expected negative impacts for urban freight transport can be arguments against implementing restrictive measures targeting passenger traffic. The scarcity of empirical studies might lead to over- or underestimation of consequences for urban freight transport. This might slow shifts towards more sustainable mobility or cause unintended negative consequences. A long-planned 14-month capacity reduction in a main road tunnel in Oslo, Norway, causing significantly increased congestion, offered an excellent opportunity to study urban freight transport adaptations, effects and consequences. With truck drivers and logistics professionals as key informants, the study amplifies voices not often heard in research. Truck drivers adapted by avoiding the tunnel during rush hours only to a limited degree, and less than general traffic did. They reported limited flexibility, as routes and trip timing are strongly defined by customer contracts. The wider consequences for drivers were more stress and less predictable workdays. The findings might improve understandings of how truck drivers can and do adapt, and what consequences they experience. This will help authorities and freight companies plan for changes in urban transport systems aimed at sustainable mobility.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 83
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Influences on urban freight transport policy choice by local authorities
    Akgun, Emine Zehra
    Monios, Jason
    Rye, Tom
    Fonzone, Achille
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 75 : 88 - 98
  • [2] Allen J., 2000, FRAMEWORK CONSIDERIN
  • [3] Aydin S.G., 2012, Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol, V1, P379, DOI [10.1260/2046-0430.1.4.379, DOI 10.1260/2046-0430.1.4.379]
  • [4] A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs
    Ballantyne, Erica E. F.
    Lindholm, Maria
    Whiteing, Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32 : 93 - 101
  • [5] Browne M., 2003, LIT REV WM9 1
  • [6] London 2012: changing delivery patterns in response to the impact of the Games on traffic flows
    Browne, Michael
    Allen, Julian
    Wainwright, Ian
    Palmer, Andrew
    Williams, Ian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (02) : 244 - 261
  • [7] Cairns S, 2002, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V151, P13
  • [8] Downs A., 2004, Still stuck in traffic: coping with peak-hour traffic congestion
  • [9] European Union, 2004, EU DIR 2004 54 SAF R
  • [10] Five misunderstandings about case-study research
    Flyvbjerg, B
    [J]. QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2006, 12 (02) : 219 - 245