Cognitive and motivational characteristics as predictors of students' expository versus narrative text comprehension

被引:2
作者
Neri, Nadine Cruz [1 ]
Bernholt, Sascha [2 ]
Haertig, Hendrik [3 ]
Schmitz, Anke [4 ]
Retelsdorf, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Von Melle Pk 8, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Sci & Math Educ, Olshausenstr 62, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Univ Str 2, D-45117 Essen, Germany
[4] Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz, Bahnhofstr 6, CH-5210 Windisch, Switzerland
关键词
Text comprehension; Narrative text; Expository text; Reading motivation; Cognitive processes; Genre; CONNOR-DAVIDSON RESILIENCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SELF-EFFICACY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; MEDIATING ROLE; RESOURCES; SCALE; METAANALYSIS; ACHIEVEMENT; CRITIQUE;
D O I
10.1007/s10212-023-00717-1
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Prior research has examined the impact of different cognitive predictors on students' expository and narrative text comprehension. It has become apparent that some cognitive variables predict text comprehension in both genres, while some are genre-specific predictors. However, the effect of reading motivation on expository and narrative text comprehension remains unclear. Thus, the aim was to investigate which reading-related cognitive and motivational characteristics predict universal versus genre-specific text comprehension. The sample consisted of 261 eighth graders (age: M = 14.96; 37.9% girls). Applying path modeling, the results showed that students' vocabulary was a significant predictor of text comprehension in both genres. Furthermore, reading strategy knowledge predicted text comprehension of a narrative and an expository text. Reading for interest predicted text comprehension in two of three expository texts. Identifying these universal and genre-specific characteristics of text comprehension can enable teachers to foster students' text comprehension by targeting these specific skills.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 905
页数:21
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [11] Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension
    Delgado, Pablo
    Vargas, Cristina
    Ackerman, Rakefet
    Salmeron, Ladislao
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2018, 25 : 23 - 38
  • [12] Adolescents' use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender
    Denton, Carolyn A.
    Wolters, Christopher A.
    York, Mary J.
    Swanson, Elizabeth
    Kulesz, Paulina A.
    Francis, David J.
    [J]. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 37 : 81 - 95
  • [13] Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective
    Fang, ZH
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2005, 89 (02) : 335 - 347
  • [14] A STANDARD INTERNATIONAL SOCIOECONOMIC INDEX OF OCCUPATIONAL-STATUS
    GANZEBOOM, HBG
    DEGRAAF, PM
    TREIMAN, DJ
    DELEEUW, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (01) : 1 - 56
  • [15] Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison of words found in children's narrative and expository reading materials
    Gardner, D
    [J]. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2004, 25 (01) : 1 - 37
  • [16] Reading-Specific Flexibility Moderates the Relation Between Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension During the Elementary Years
    Gnaedinger, Emily K.
    Hund, Alycia M.
    Hesson-McInnis, Matthew S.
    [J]. MIND BRAIN AND EDUCATION, 2016, 10 (04) : 233 - 246
  • [17] Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real World
    Graham, John W.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 : 549 - 576
  • [18] Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading
    Guthrie, John T.
    McRae, Angela
    Klauda, Susan Lutz
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 42 (04) : 237 - 250
  • [19] Hartig H., 2019, Z DIDAKTIK NATURWISS, V25, P273, DOI [10.1007/s40573-019-00105-7, DOI 10.1007/S40573-019-00105-7]
  • [20] Reciprocal Effects between Reading Achievement and Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reading Motivation
    Hebbecker, Karin
    Foerster, Natalie
    Souvignier, Elmar
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2019, 23 (05) : 419 - 436