Mini-Publics as an innovation in spatial governance

被引:0
作者
Durrant, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
Cohen, Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London, England
[2] Univ Westminster, Transport, London, England
[3] UCL, Ucl Fac Built Environm, Bartlett Sch Planning, Cent House,14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England
关键词
Mini-publics; transport; governance; deliberative democracy; innovation; DELIBERATION; INFRASTRUCTURE; POLITICS; LESSONS; EXPERIMENTATION; TRANSPORT; DEMOCRACY; ENGLAND; SPACES; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/23996544231176392
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mini-publics-deliberative fora made up of randomly selected, representative groups of citizens-have attracted considerable interest as a means of resolving perceived weaknesses in existing forms of governance. In this paper, we consider the use of a mini-public or citizens' assembly to constitute an ad hoc governance space based on the Travel to Work Area of Cambridge in the United Kingdom rather than working within the existing local government boundaries within which transport infrastructure is usually governed. Through this case study, we explore the question of embedding mini-publics in the wider processes of policy and decision-making. More specifically this is the question of the extent to which they ought to be permitted to inform and even assume responsibility for local-level transport policy decisions. We argue that, if they are to become more widely used, then it will be necessary to understand the practices associated with such democratic experiments and their potential to transform existing governance networks in contested areas of spatial policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1199
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Allmendinger P., 2015, Soft spaces i Europe: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders
  • [2] Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?
    Allmendinger, Phil
    Haughton, Graham
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2012, 37 (01) : 89 - 103
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Employee Engagement: A Review of Current Thinking
  • [4] Shared visions, unholy alliances: Power, governance and deliberative processes in local transport planning
    Bickerstaff, K
    Walker, G
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2005, 42 (12) : 2123 - 2144
  • [5] Deliberation and inclusion: vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance?
    Bloomfield, D
    Collins, K
    Fry, C
    Munton, R
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2001, 19 (04): : 501 - 513
  • [6] Brammall S., 2020, INNOVATION DEMOCRACY
  • [7] Embedding participatory governance
    Bussu, Sonia
    Bua, Adrian
    Dean, Rikki
    Smith, Graham
    [J]. CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2022, 16 (02) : 133 - 145
  • [8] Mobilities II: Still
    Cresswell, Tim
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (05) : 645 - 653
  • [9] Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system: a research agenda
    Curato, Nicole
    Boeker, Marit
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 2016, 49 (02) : 173 - 190
  • [10] DCMS/MHCLG, 2019, INN DEM PROGR LIDP