Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil

被引:6
作者
Armond, Anna Catharina Vieira [1 ]
Kakuk, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Debrecen, Dept Behav Sci, Debrecen, Hungary
[2] Cent European Univ, Ctr Eth & Law Biomed, Budapest, Hungary
来源
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY | 2023年 / 30卷 / 03期
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Research integrity; research ethics; research misconduct; Brazil; guidance on research integrity; RESEARCH MISCONDUCT; GUIDANCE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Brazilian research output has been growing annually, and so have its domestic and international research collaborations. Accordingly, it is essential to harmonize research integrity guidance and regulations to ensure research quality. Therefore, this study aims to collect and analyze guidance documents on research integrity from Brazilian research performing organizations (RPO). Research integrity guidance documents, regulations, and policies were retrieved from 60 randomly selected universities in Brazil. The search was conducted via the universities' websites and confirmed by e-mail. The documents were analyzed based on inductive content analysis. Relevant documents from 20 RPOs were identified. 28% of the included institutions have developed their own guidelines or adopted some guidance document on research integrity. Best practices, misconduct and misbehaviors, principles, and institutional policies regarding sanctions differ between universities. The RPOs where research integrity guidance documents could be identified are concentrated mainly in the southeastern and southern areas. The number and distribution heterogeneity highlights the need to increase awareness and create regulatory documents on research integrity in Brazilian universities. Further Research Performing and Funding Organizations' initiatives are needed to foster research integrity in Brazil and harmonize it with international standards.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 149
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
  • [2] European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct: Accessibility, Approaches, and Content
    Bonn, Noemie Aubert
    Godecharle, Simon
    Dierickx, Kris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2017, 12 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [3] BRASIL, 2019, CENSO ED SUPERIOR
  • [4] Clarivate Analytics, 2018, RES BRAZ REP CAPES C
  • [5] Dal ReR., 2020, Research Ethics, V16, DOI DOI 10.1177/1747016119898400
  • [6] Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files
    Davis, Mark S.
    Riske-Morris, Michelle
    Diaz, Sebastian R.
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2007, 13 (04) : 395 - 414
  • [7] Research integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergences
    Desmond, Hugh
    Dierickx, Kris
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2021, 35 (05) : 414 - 428
  • [9] Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity
    Fanelli, Daniele
    Costas, Rodrigo
    Lariviere, Vincent
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [10] Working with Research Integrity-Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
    Forsberg, Ellen-Marie
    Anthun, Frank O.
    Bailey, Sharon
    Birchley, Giles
    Bout, Henriette
    Casonato, Carlo
    Fuster, Gloria Gonzalez
    Heinrichs, Bert
    Horbach, Serge
    Jacobsen, Ingrid Skjaeggestad
    Janssen, Jacques
    Kaiser, Matthias
    Lerouge, Inge
    van der Meulen, Barend
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    Saretzki, Thomas
    Sutrop, Margit
    Tazewell, Marta
    Varantola, Krista
    Vie, Knut Jorgen
    Zwart, Hub
    Zoeller, Mira
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2018, 24 (04) : 1023 - 1034