A review on h-index and its alternative indices

被引:62
作者
Bihari, Anand [1 ]
Tripathi, Sudhakar [2 ]
Deepak, Akshay [3 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Informat Technol & Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Rajkiya Engn Coll, Dept Informat & Technol, Aher, India
[3] Natl Inst Technol Patna, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Patna, Bihar, India
关键词
Bibliometric indices; h-index; scientometrics indices; SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; HIRSCH-INDEX; EM-INDEX; AR-INDEX; R-INDEX; PUBLICATIONS; AUTHORS; IMPACT; INDICATORS; QUANTIFY;
D O I
10.1177/01655515211014478
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In recent years, several scientometrics and bibliometrics indicators were proposed to evaluate the scientific impact of individuals, institutions, colleges, universities and research teams. The h-index gives a breakthrough in the research community for assessing the scientific impact of an individual. It got a lot of attention due to its simplicity, and several other indicators were proposed to extend the properties of the h-index and to overcome its shortcomings. In this literature review, we have discussed the advantages and limitations of almost all scientometrics and bibliometrics indicators, which have been categorised into seven categories based on their properties: (1) complement of h-index, (2) based on total number of authors, (3) based on publication age, (4) combination of two indices, (5) based on excess citation count, (6) based on total publication count and (7) based on other variants. The primary objective of this article is to study all those indicators which have been proposed to evaluate the scientific impact of an individual researcher or a group of researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 665
页数:42
相关论文
共 154 条
[51]   Research metrics: What about weighted citations? [J].
Erren, Thomas C. ;
Gross, J. Valerie .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 107 (01) :315-316
[52]   A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation [J].
Fenner, Trevor ;
Harris, Martyn ;
Levene, Mark ;
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07)
[53]   Scientific Impact Evaluation and the Effect of Self-Citations: Mitigating the Bias by Discounting the h-Index [J].
Ferrara, Emilio ;
Romero, Alfonso E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (11) :2332-2339
[54]   Current Index: A Proposal for a Dynamic Rating System for Researchers [J].
Fiala, Dalibor .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 65 (04) :850-855
[55]   The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual's research output [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Galetto, Maurizio ;
Maisano, Domenico ;
Mastrogiacomo, Luca .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 92 (03) :621-641
[56]   The citation triad: An overview of a scientist's publication output based on Ferrers diagrams [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Maisano, Domenico .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2010, 4 (04) :503-511
[57]   Analysis of the Hirsch index's operational properties [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Maisano, Domenico A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 203 (02) :494-504
[58]   Tailor based allocations for multiple authorship: a fractional gh-index [J].
Galam, Serge .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (01) :365-379
[59]   An extension of the h index that covers the tail and the top of the citation curve and allows ranking researchers with similar h [J].
Garcia-Perez, Miguel A. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (04) :689-699
[60]   A multidimensional extension to Hirsch's h-index [J].
Garcia-Perez, Miguel A. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 81 (03) :779-785