A review on h-index and its alternative indices

被引:62
作者
Bihari, Anand [1 ]
Tripathi, Sudhakar [2 ]
Deepak, Akshay [3 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Informat Technol & Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Rajkiya Engn Coll, Dept Informat & Technol, Aher, India
[3] Natl Inst Technol Patna, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Patna, Bihar, India
关键词
Bibliometric indices; h-index; scientometrics indices; SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; HIRSCH-INDEX; EM-INDEX; AR-INDEX; R-INDEX; PUBLICATIONS; AUTHORS; IMPACT; INDICATORS; QUANTIFY;
D O I
10.1177/01655515211014478
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In recent years, several scientometrics and bibliometrics indicators were proposed to evaluate the scientific impact of individuals, institutions, colleges, universities and research teams. The h-index gives a breakthrough in the research community for assessing the scientific impact of an individual. It got a lot of attention due to its simplicity, and several other indicators were proposed to extend the properties of the h-index and to overcome its shortcomings. In this literature review, we have discussed the advantages and limitations of almost all scientometrics and bibliometrics indicators, which have been categorised into seven categories based on their properties: (1) complement of h-index, (2) based on total number of authors, (3) based on publication age, (4) combination of two indices, (5) based on excess citation count, (6) based on total publication count and (7) based on other variants. The primary objective of this article is to study all those indicators which have been proposed to evaluate the scientific impact of an individual researcher or a group of researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 665
页数:42
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]   Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship [J].
Abbas, Ash Mohammad .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 88 (01) :107-131
[2]  
Abbasi A., 2009, TECHNICAL REPORT
[3]   Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: two indices, the RC-index and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Altmann, Joern ;
Hwang, Junseok .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 83 (01) :1-13
[4]   Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study [J].
Ajiferuke, Isola ;
Wolfram, Dietmar .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 83 (03) :623-638
[5]   hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 82 (02) :391-400
[6]   h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) :273-289
[7]  
Altmann J, 2009, EVALUATING PRODUCTIV
[8]   Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output [J].
Anderson, Thomas R. ;
Hankin, Robin K. S. ;
Killworth, Peter D. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 76 (03) :577-588
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ISSI NEWSLETT
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Science Focus