The heterogeneous and transfer effects of a texting-based intervention on enhancing university English learners' vocabulary knowledge

被引:2
作者
Li, Jia [1 ]
Ji, Linying [2 ]
Deng, Qizhen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Educ, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Hlth & Human Dev, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Boise State Univ, Dept Literacy Language & Culture, Boise, ID 83725 USA
关键词
Direct and transfer intervention effect; English language learners; heterogeneous intervention effect; texting-based vocabulary intervention; vocabulary knowledge levels; LANGUAGE LEARNERS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MOBILE PHONES; ACQUISITION; INSTRUCTION; PROFICIENCY; COMPREHENSION; STORYBOOKS; TELEVISION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/09588221.2021.1900264
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the growing body of technology-assisted vocabulary intervention studies, few have addressed learning outcomes beyond target vocabulary and the interaction between the interventions and English language learners' (ELLs) initially different levels of vocabulary knowledge. The study examined the differential effects of a texting-based intervention on ELLs' learning of target (direct effect) and general vocabulary knowledge (transfer effect) as a function of learners' initial vocabulary levels. Canadian undergraduate ELLs (N = 115) participated in a 9-week intervention study. The findings showed that texting-based instruction effectively supported university ELLs' acquisition of academic vocabulary; varied direct and indirect learning outcomes were found given learners' different initial vocabulary levels. These results provide insights into the design of future vocabulary interventions by considering the complex interactions between learners' initial vocabulary knowledge and the technology scaffoldings used for interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 80
页数:29
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis
    Abraham, Lee B.
    [J]. COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2008, 21 (03) : 199 - 226
  • [2] American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, 2012, ACTFL PROF GUID 2012
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, READING UNDERSTANDIN
  • [4] August D., 2006, Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language minority children and youth, V1st, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315094922
  • [5] Beck I.L., 2013, BRINGING WORDS LIFE, V2nd Edn
  • [6] L2 reading proficiency and lexical inferencing by university EFL learners
    Bengeleil, NF
    Paribakht, TS
    [J]. CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, 2004, 61 (02): : 225 - 249
  • [7] Bernhardt E.B., 2011, UNDERSTANDING ADV 2
  • [8] On the benefits of multimodal annotations for vocabulary uptake from reading
    Boers, Frank
    Warren, Paul
    Grimshaw, Gina
    Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna
    [J]. COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2017, 30 (07) : 709 - 725
  • [9] Quizlet and podcasts: effects on vocabulary acquisition
    Bueno-Alastuey, M. Camino
    Nemeth, Katalin
    [J]. COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2022, 35 (07) : 1407 - 1436
  • [10] Burger A., 2011, ENCY CHILD BEHAVIOUR, P122