Occupational Therapy Students' Evidence-Based Practice Skills as Reported in a Mobile App: Cross-Sectional Study

被引:0
作者
Johnson, Susanne G. [1 ,4 ]
Espehaug, Birgitte [1 ]
Larun, Lillebeth [2 ]
Ciliska, Donna [3 ]
Olsen, Nina Rydland [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Hlth & Functioning, Bergen, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Serv, Oslo, Norway
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Hlth & Functioning, Inndalsveien 28, N-5063 Bergen, Norway
关键词
active learning strategies; application; cross-sectional study; development; education; higher education; interactive; mobile application; mobile app; occupational therapy students; occupational therapy; students; usability; use; INSTRUMENTS; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.2196/48507
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence -based practice (EBP) is an important aspect of the health care education curriculum. EBP involves following the 5 EBP steps: ask, assess, appraise, apply, and audit. These 5 steps reflect the suggested core competencies covered in teaching and learning programs to support future health care professionals applying EBP. When implementing EBP teaching, assessing outcomes by documenting the student's performance and skills is relevant. This can be done using mobile devices. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess occupational therapy students' EBP skills as reported in a mobile app. Methods: We applied a cross-sectional design. Descriptive statistics were used to present frequencies, percentages, means, and ranges of data regarding EBP skills found in the EBPsteps app. Associations between students' ability to formulate the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome/Population, Interest, and Context (PICO/PICo) elements and identifying relevant research evidence were analyzed with the chi-square test. Results: Of 4 cohorts with 150 students, 119 (79.3%) students used the app and produced 240 critically appraised topics (CATs) in the app. The EBP steps "ask," "assess," and "appraise" were often correctly performed. The clinical question was formulated correctly in 53.3% (128/240) of the CATs, and students identified research evidence in 81.2% (195/240) of the CATs. Critical appraisal checklists were used in 81.2% (195/240) of the CATs, and most of these checklists were assessed as relevant for the type of research evidence identified (165/195, 84.6%). The least frequently correctly reported steps were "apply" and "audit." In 39.6% (95/240) of the CATs, it was reported that research evidence was applied. Only 61% (58/95) of these CATs described how the research was applied to clinical practice. Evaluation of practice changes was reported in 38.8% (93/240) of the CATs. However, details about practice changes were lacking in all these CATs. A positive association was found between correctly reporting the "population" and "interventions/interest" elements of the PICO/PICo and identifying research evidence (P<.001). Conclusions: We assessed the students' EBP skills based on how they documented following the EBP steps in the EBPsteps app, and our results showed variations in how well the students mastered the steps. "Apply" and "audit" were the most difficult EBP steps for the students to perform, and this finding has implications and gives directions for further development of the app and educational instruction in EBP. The EBPsteps app is a new and relevant app for students to learn and practice EBP, and it can be used to assess students' EBP skills objectively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey [J].
Albarqouni, Loai ;
Hoffmann, Tammy ;
Straus, Sharon ;
Olsen, Nina Rydland ;
Young, Taryn ;
Ilic, Dragan ;
Shaneyfelt, Terrence ;
Haynes, R. Brian ;
Guyatt, Gordon ;
Glasziou, Paul .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (02) :e180281
[2]   Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured [J].
Albarqouni, Loai ;
Hoffmann, Tammy ;
Glasziou, Paul .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows [Computer Software]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Study plan-bachelor in occupational therapy
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Regulations on a common framework for health- and social care training programmes
[7]   What are the effects of teaching Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) at different levels of health professions education? An updated overview of systematic reviews [J].
Bala, Malgorzata M. ;
Poklepovic Pericic, Tina ;
Zajac, Joanna ;
Rohwer, Anke ;
Klugarova, Jitka ;
Valimaki, Maritta ;
Lantta, Tella ;
Pingani, Luca ;
Klugar, Miloslav ;
Clarke, Mike ;
Young, Taryn .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07)
[8]   Survey Instruments for Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes and Behaviour Related to Evidence-based Practice in Occupational Therapy: A Systematic Review [J].
Buchanan, Helen ;
Siegfried, Nandi ;
Jelsma, Jennifer .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 23 (02) :59-90
[9]   How to write a Critically Appraised Topic: evidence to underpin routine clinical practice [J].
Callander, J. ;
Anstey, A. V. ;
Ingram, J. R. ;
Limpens, J. ;
Flohr, C. ;
Spul, P. I. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 177 (04) :1007-1013
[10]   EOccupational Therapy Master-Level Students' Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge and Skills Before and After Fieldwork [J].
Crabtree, Jeffrey ;
Justiss, Michael ;
Swinehart, Susan .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 26 (2-3) :138-149