Individual differences and anti-vaccine radical collective action intention: The moderating role of group norms

被引:0
作者
Gajda, Anna N. [1 ]
Jaskiewicz, Michal [1 ]
Cupta, Aleksandra [1 ]
Nitek, Martyna [1 ]
Nobis, Agata [1 ]
Besta, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Personality; Disinhibition; Group violence; Anti-vaccine movements; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; TRIARCHIC CONCEPTUALIZATION; PSYCHOPATHY; MODEL; PERSONALITY; MOTIVATIONS; PREVENTION; TERRORISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2023.112522
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research comprises three studies conducted in the United States and Poland, investigating predictors of radical action intentions within anti-vaccine movements. The American sample included 252 participants (N1), while the Polish samples had 316 (N2) and 538 (N3) participants. The studies focused on the association between personality traits (meanness, disinhibition, subclinical sadism) and willingness to engage in radical collective action. Building on previous work connecting antisocial tendencies to social behaviours, our research delves into the specific link between non-clinical traits and violent collective actions. Across all studies, positive and significant associations were found between these traits and radical collective action intentions. Notably, our findings highlight that the perception of social norms moderates these relationships. When radical actions are perceived as normative, the link between disinhibition and willingness to choose radical means is stronger and significant. Conversely, when actions are seen as non-normative and unacceptable, the relationship weakens. This moderation effect is consistent in both Poland and the United States, with some observed differences in the strength of indirect effects. The synthesis of insights from personality and social psychology proves vital for a nuanced understanding of collective behaviour.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [71] START (National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism), 2022, GLOB TERR DAT 1970 2
  • [72] Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change
    Tankard, Margaret E.
    Paluck, Elizabeth Levy
    [J]. SOCIAL ISSUES AND POLICY REVIEW, 2016, 10 (01) : 181 - 211
  • [73] Tardaguila C., 2020, Coronavirus deniers are real, even if their message isn't
  • [74] MOBILISE: A Higher-Order Integration of Collective Action Research to Address Global Challenges
    Thomas, Emma F.
    Duncan, Lauren
    McGarty, Craig
    Louis, Winnifred R.
    Smith, Laura G. E.
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 43 : 107 - 164
  • [75] Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action
    Thomas, Emma F.
    Mavor, Kenneth I.
    McGarty, Craig
    [J]. GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2012, 15 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [76] Are radicalization and terrorism associated with psychiatric disorders? A systematic review
    Trimbur, Margot
    Amad, Ali
    Horn, Mathilde
    Thomas, Pierre
    Fovet, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 141 : 214 - 222
  • [77] The Banality of Extremism: The Role of Group Dynamics and Communication of Norms in Polarization on January 6
    Van Swol, Lyn
    Lee, Sangwon
    Hutchins, Rachel
    [J]. GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 26 (03) : 239 - 251
  • [78] Four Core Social-Psychological Motivations to Undertake Collective Action
    van Zomeren, Martijn
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2013, 7 (06): : 378 - 388
  • [79] Protesters as "Passionate Economists": A Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping With Collective Disadvantage
    van Zomeren, Martijn
    Leach, Colin Wayne
    Spears, Russell
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 16 (02) : 180 - 199
  • [80] Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public
    Weber, LM
    Loumakis, A
    Bergman, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2003, 21 (01) : 26 - 42