A Minimum Adjustment Cost Consensus Framework Considering Harmony Degrees and Trust Propagation for Social Network Group Decision Making

被引:30
作者
Yuan, Yuxiang [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Dong [3 ]
Zhou, Zhili [2 ]
Cheng, Faxin [4 ]
机构
[1] Xidian Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian 710071, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[3] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai 200051, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Management, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS | 2023年 / 53卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Linguistics; Costs; Social networking (online); Decision making; Convergence; Resource management; Indexes; Consensus reaching process (CRP); harmony degree; minimum adjustment cost; social network group decision making; trust propagation; LINGUISTIC INFORMATION; RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; OPINION DYNAMICS; MODEL; SATISFACTION; TASK;
D O I
10.1109/TSMC.2022.3200433
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In consensus-based social network group decision-making (SN-GDM) problems, the low degree of harmony caused by opinion discrepancies and weak trust relationships may lead to high consensus costs and conflict among experts. To address these problems, we design a minimum adjustment cost consensus framework considering harmony degrees in SN-GDM with incomplete 2-tuple linguistic trust. First, considering the decay of trust through its propagation process, a discount-factor-based 2-tuple linguistic trust propagation operator is proposed to estimate the unknown trust relationships among experts. Then, the harmony degrees are measured based on opinion discrepancies and 2-tuple linguistic trust values, and experts' weights could be obtained. To improve the consensus levels of the inconsistent experts, a minimum adjustment cost consensus model considering harmony degrees is explored to generate interval recommendations. The existence of optimal solutions and the convergence of the proposed consensus model are also proved. Finally, the validity of the proposed consensus framework is verified by the case of base station selection. With the higher overall harmony degree and individual consensus level, we extend the classical minimum cost consensus model and incorporate the harmony degrees among experts into the consensus reaching process.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1465
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [2] Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity
    Ben-Arieh, D.
    Easton, T.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2007, 43 (03) : 713 - 721
  • [3] A Personalized Consensus Feedback Mechanism Based on Maximum Harmony Degree
    Cao, Mingshuo
    Wu, Jian
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Urena, Raquel
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (10): : 6134 - 6146
  • [4] An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement
    Chao, Xiangrui
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 575 : 499 - 527
  • [5] Chen CC, 2016, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V33, P903, DOI 10.1007/s10490-016-9457-0
  • [6] Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors
    Cheng, Dong
    Yuan, Yuxiang
    Wu, Yong
    Hao, Tiantian
    Cheng, Faxin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 297 (01) : 221 - 238
  • [7] Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making
    Cheng, Dong
    Cheng, Faxin
    Zhou, Zhili
    Wu, Yong
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 : 30 - 43
  • [8] Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context
    Cheng, Dong
    Zhou, Zhili
    Cheng, Faxin
    Zhou, Yanfang
    Xie, Yujing
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 270 (03) : 1122 - 1137
  • [9] Type-1 OWA Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Methodology: Application to Eurobonds Credit Risk Evaluation
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Mata, Francisco
    Perez, Luis G.
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (05) : 1071 - 1088
  • [10] Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis
    De Dreu, CKW
    Weingart, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (04) : 741 - 749