Choice of O2O Food Delivery Mode: Self-built Platform or Third-Party Platform? Self-Delivery or Third-Party Delivery?

被引:32
作者
Du, Zhong [1 ]
Fan, Zhi-Ping [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Guang-Xin [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, State Key Lab Synthet Automat Proc Ind, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Advertising; Logistics; Companies; Pricing; Industries; Crowdsourcing; Business; Advertising effect; choice of delivery mode; consumer benefit; online-to-offline (O2O) food delivery; pricing; CARRIER COLLABORATION; ONLINE; PICKUP; INTENTION; CHANNELS; DISCOUNT; AUCTION;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2021.3069457
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the optimal choice strategy of online-to-offline (O2O) food delivery mode for a merchant. In practice, there are four modes that are widely adopted by merchants: 1) The self-built platform and self-delivery (Mode SS); 2) the self-built platform and third-party delivery (Mode ST); 3) the third-party platform and self-delivery (Mode TS); and 4) the third-party platform and third-party delivery (Mode TT). First, we establish the merchant's profit model under each mode. Then, by comparing the merchant's profits under different modes, we analyze the optimal choice strategy of food delivery mode for the merchant. The results show that when third party service providers provide delivery services (TPSPs), if the advertising effect generated by the self-delivery is large and the consumer benefit brought by the third-party platform's promotion is small, the merchant should choose SS; if the advertising effect and the consumer benefit are both small (large), the merchant should choose ST (TS); if the advertising effect is small and the consumer benefit is large, the merchant should choose TT. Furthermore, from the perspective of the O2O food delivery system, TS (TT) is the best mode if the advertising effect is large (small).
引用
收藏
页码:2206 / 2219
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   When retailers and manufacturers advertise together; examining the effect of co-operative advertising on ad reach and memorability [J].
Cathy Nguyen ;
Romaniuk, Jenni ;
Cohen, Justin ;
Faulkner, Margaret .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2020, 55
[2]  
Chang N., 2019, LOGIST SCI TECH, P1
[3]   Optimal pricing in on-demand-service-platform-operations with hired agents and risk-sensitive customers in the blockchain era [J].
Choi, Tsan-Ming ;
Guo, Shu ;
Liu, Na ;
Shi, Xiutian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 284 (03) :1031-1042
[4]   Price-setting based combinatorial auction approach for carrier collaboration with pickup and delivery requests [J].
Dai, Bo ;
Chen, Haoxun ;
Yang, Genke .
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (03) :361-386
[5]  
Esper T.L., 2003, Journal of Business Logistics, V24, P177, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2158-1592.2003.TB00051.X
[6]   Pricing and advertising in a supply chain in the presence of strategic consumers * , ** , *** [J].
Farshbaf-Geranmayeh, Amir ;
Zaccour, Georges .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 101
[7]   The Bullwhip Effect in an Online Retail Supply Chain: A Perspective of Price-Sensitive Demand Based on the Price Discount in E-Commerce [J].
Gao, Dandan ;
Wang, Nengmin ;
He, Zhengwen ;
Jia, Tao .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 64 (02) :134-148
[8]   A Crowdsourcing Approach for Sustainable Last Mile Delivery [J].
Giret, Adriana ;
Carrascosa, Carlos ;
Julian, Vicente ;
Rebollo, Miguel ;
Botti, Vicente .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
[9]   Evolutionary food quality and location strategies for restaurants in competitive online-to-offline food ordering and delivery markets: An agent-based approach [J].
He, Zhou ;
Han, Guanghua ;
Cheng, T. C. E. ;
Fan, Bo ;
Dong, Jichang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 215 :61-72
[10]   Strategic Motive for Introducing Internet Channels in a Supply Chain [J].
Hsiao, Lu ;
Chen, Ying-Ju .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 23 (01) :36-47