Efficacy of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in type 1 diabetes: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials

被引:1
作者
Stahl-Pehe, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Schlesinger, Sabrina [1 ,2 ]
Kuss, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
Shokri-Mashhadi, Nafiseh [1 ,2 ]
Baechle, Christina [1 ,2 ]
Warz, Klaus-D [3 ]
Buerger-Buesing, Jutta [4 ]
Holl, Reinhard [2 ,5 ]
Spoerkel, Olaf [1 ,2 ]
Rosenbauer, Joachim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, German Diabet Ctr, Leibniz Ctr Diabet Res, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] German Ctr Diabet Res, Neuherberg, Germany
[3] Deutsch Diabet Foderat DDF, Berlin, Germany
[4] Bund Diabetischer Kinder & Jugendlicher BdKJ, Kaiserslautern, Germany
[5] Univ Ulm, Inst Epidemiol & Med Biometr, Ulm, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
systematic review; diabetes & endocrinology; quality of life; ONCOLOGY NURSING-EDUCATION; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; PEDIATRIC-ONCOLOGY; CHILDREN; CANCER; WORKFORCE; WORKING; AFRICA; NURSES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074317
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Automated insulin delivery (AID), also known as artificial pancreas system or 'closed-loop system', represents a novel option for current treatments for type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of AID systems in comparison with current intensified insulin therapy for glycaemic control and patient-reported outcomes in individuals with T1D.Methods and analysis Studies will be eligible if they are randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with T1D of all ages, and if they compare an AID system for self-administration during the day and night period with any other type of insulin therapy for at least 3 weeks. The primary outcome will be time in the glucose target range of 70-180 mg/dL. A systematic review will be conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov registries from their inception dates. Two authors will independently screen all references based on titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria. For data extraction, standard forms will be developed and tested before extraction. All information will be assessed independently by at least two reviewers. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. The data synthesis will include a random-effects pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) in a frequentist framework. Where applicable and if sufficient RCTs are available, sensitivity analyses will be performed, and heterogeneity and publication bias will be assessed. The certainty of evidence from the NMA will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group guidance.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is needed. The results will be reported to the funder, presented in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and at conferences, and disseminated via press release, social media and public events.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Adejumo PO, 2021, J Nurs Educ Pract., V11, P68, DOI [10.5430/jnep.v11n9p68, DOI 10.5430/JNEP.V11N9P68]
  • [2] Differences in clinical reasoning among nurses working in highly specialised paediatric care
    Andersson, Nina
    Klang, Birgitta
    Petersson, Gunilla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2012, 21 (5-6) : 870 - 879
  • [3] Cancer in Africa: the way forward
    Boyle, Peter
    Ngoma, Twalib
    Sullivan, Richard
    Brawley, Otis
    [J]. ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [4] Access to and experience of education for children and adolescents with cancer: a scoping review protocol
    Bryan, Gemma
    Kelly, Paula
    Chesters, Heather
    Franklin, Jayne
    Griffiths, Helen
    Langton, Loveday
    Langton, Luke
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Gibson, Faith
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [5] Outcome at the end of treatment of patients with common and curable childhood cancer types in Blantyre, Malawi
    Chakumatha, Eunice
    Weijers, Janna
    Banda, Kondwani
    Bailey, Simon
    Molyneux, Elizabeth
    Chagaluka, George
    Israels, Trijn
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2020, 67 (07)
  • [6] Addressing the global pediatric oncology nursing workforce gap: An overdue imperative
    Challinor, Julia M.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2022, 9 (02) : 77 - 78
  • [7] Educational Needs and Strategies of Pediatric Oncology Nurses in Low- and Middle-Income Countries An International Society of Pediatric Oncology Pediatric Oncology in Developing Countries Nursing Working Group Initiative
    Challinor, Julia M.
    Hollis, Rachel
    Freidank, Carola
    Verhoeven, Catherine
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2014, 37 (04) : E36 - E47
  • [8] Nurse Reports on Resource Adequacy in Hospitals that Care for Acutely Ill Children
    Cimiotti, Jeannie P.
    Barton, Sharon J.
    Gorman, Kathleen E. Chavanu
    Sloane, Douglas M.
    Aiken, Linda H.
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2014, 36 (02) : 25 - 32
  • [9] The Latin American Center for Pediatric Oncology Nursing Education: Development, Implementation, and Accomplishments
    Day, Sara W.
    Segovia, Lorena
    Viveros, Paola
    Alqudimat, Mohammad R.
    Rivera, Gaston K.
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2013, 36 (05) : 340 - 345
  • [10] A sustainable model for pediatric oncology nursing education in low-income countries
    Day, Sara W.
    Garcia, Jose
    Antillon, Federico
    Wilimas, Judith A.
    McKeon, Leslie M.
    Carty, Rita M.
    de Alarcon, Pedro
    Pui, Ching-Hon
    Ribeiro, Raul C.
    Howard, Scott C.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2012, 58 (02) : 163 - 166