Distribution Center Location Selection in Humanitarian Logistics Using Hybrid BWM-ARAS: A Case Study in Turkiye

被引:5
作者
Erden, Caner [1 ,2 ]
Ates, Cagdas [3 ]
Esen, Sinan [3 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ Appl Sci, Fac Appl Sci Int Trade & Finance, Merkez Mah,Sht Fahrettin Azak Cd 28-3, TR-54650 Sakarya, Turkiye
[2] Sakarya Univ Appl Sci, AI Res & Applicat Ctr, Sakarya, Turkiye
[3] Sakarya Univ Appl Sci, Fac Appl Sci Int Trade & Logist, Sakarya, Turkiye
关键词
ARAS; Best Worst Method; distribution center location; humanitarian logistics; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; BEST-WORST METHOD; SUSTAINABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK; BARRIERS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1515/jhsem-2022-0052
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This study investigates the criteria affecting the location of humanitarian logistics distribution centers in the Sakarya province of Turkey, an area prone to natural disasters. The study identifies potential distribution center locations and uses the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine criteria such as population, distance to major highways and airports, public transportation availability, natural disaster risk, and suitable infrastructure. BWM is used to assign weights to each criterion and rank them based on their importance. The Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method is then used to evaluate potential distribution center locations based on the established criteria. Disaster management experts and academicians provide their opinions through an online and face-to-face survey. Based on the results, Adapazari is identified as the most suitable district for a humanitarian logistics distribution center. The study highlights the importance of considering multiple criteria when selecting distribution center locations and provides a framework for using multi-criteria decision-making methods in logistics planning. Disaster managers and policymakers can use the results to make informed decisions about the location of humanitarian logistics distribution centers.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 415
页数:33
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] AFAD, 2022, AFAD IRAP
  • [2] Exploring sustainability balanced scorecard for performance evaluation of humanitarian organizations
    Agarwal, Sachin
    Kant, Ravi
    Shankar, Ravi
    [J]. CLEANER LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN, 2022, 3
  • [3] Lean-green performance management in Indian SMEs: a novel perspective using the best-worst method approach
    Ahmad, Shaad
    Abdullah, Ahmad
    Talib, Faisal
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (02) : 737 - 765
  • [4] Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method
    Ahmad, Wan Nurul Karimah Wan
    Rezaei, Jafar
    Sadaghiani, Saman
    Tavasszy, Lorant A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 153 (01) : 242 - 252
  • [5] Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method
    Ahmadi, Hadi Badri
    Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 126 : 99 - 106
  • [6] Ak M.F., 2021, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, V22, P400, DOI DOI 10.31590/EJOSAT.849896
  • [7] Social sustainability of treatment technologies for bioenergy generation from the municipal solid waste using best worst method
    Alidoosti, Zahra
    Sadegheih, Ahmad
    Govindan, Kannan
    Pishvaee, Mir Saman
    Mostafaeipour, Ali
    Hossain, Abul Kalam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 288
  • [8] Supplier selection to support environmental sustainability: the stratified BWM TOPSIS method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    Ahmadi, Hadi Badri
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Liou, James J. H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 322 (01) : 321 - 344
  • [9] BWM-ARAS: A new hybrid MCDM method for Cu prospectivity mapping in the Abhar area, NW Iran
    Bahrami, Yousef
    Hassani, Hossein
    Maghsoudi, Abbas
    [J]. SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2019, 33
  • [10] Baltzopoulos G., 2023, EARTHQUAKE REPORTS