The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of problem-based learning models: a systematic review

被引:6
作者
Yu, Ling [1 ]
Zin, Zuhana Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
关键词
higher education; problem-based learning; critical thinking; educational intervention; systematic review; pedagogical adaption; STUDENTS CRITICAL THINKING; NURSING-STUDENTS; VIDEO;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2023.1139987
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Critical thinking is a significant twenty-first century skill that is prioritized by higher education. Problem-based learning is becoming widely accepted as an effective way to enhance critical thinking. However, as the results of studies that use PBL to develop CT have had mixed success, PBL models need to be modified to guarantee positive outcomes. This study is a systematic review that analyzed how studies have adapted Problem-Based Learning (PBL) to become more Critical Thinking (CT)-oriented, evaluated the effectiveness of these adaptations, and determined why certain adaptations were successful. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) by searching the scientific databases Scopus and Web of Science. Twenty journal articles were chosen based on their adherence to the inclusion criteria established by PICo (Population, Phenomenon of Interest, and Context). In these studies, PBL adaptations were categorized into five classifications, with activities centered on CT development being the most prevalent approach. Researchers utilized a variety of analytical methodologies to assess the effectiveness of these adaptations and derive significant insights and formulate valid conclusions. An analysis of all selected studies revealed positive outcomes, indicating that incorporating CT elements into PBL was effective in enhancing students' CT. These findings were categorized into nine factors that contribute to the successful adaptation of PBL to be CT-oriented.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Abdellatif A., 2007, Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, V33, P439, DOI 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33128-0
  • [3] Alper A., 2010, EGITIMVE BILIM
  • [4] Barrows H.S., 1996, NEW DIRECTIONS TEACH, V1996, P3, DOI [10.1002/tl.37219966804, DOI 10.1002/TL.37219966804]
  • [5] A TAXONOMY OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING-METHODS
    BARROWS, HS
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1986, 20 (06) : 481 - 486
  • [6] Group metacognition in online collaborative learning: validity and reliability of the group metacognition scale (GMS)
    Biasutti, Michele
    Frate, Sara
    [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 66 (06): : 1321 - 1338
  • [7] Educational intervention to improve critical thinking for undergraduate nursing students: A randomized clinical trial
    Carbogim, Fabio da Costa
    Silva Barbosa, Amanda Conrado
    de Oliviera, Larissa Bertacchini
    Barbosa de Sa Diaz, Flavia Batista
    Toledo, Luana Vieira
    Alves, Katiusse Resende
    de Castro Friedrich, Denise Barbosa
    Luiz, Franciane Silva
    de Araujo Puschel, Vilanice Alves
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2018, 33 : 121 - 126
  • [8] Carbogim Fábio da Costa, 2017, Texto contexto - enferm., V26, pe1180017
  • [9] Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection)
    Carter, Amanda G.
    Creedy, Debra K.
    Sidebotham, Mary
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2017, 54 : 73 - 80
  • [10] Chaffee John., 1994, THINKING CRITICALLY