Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes: A systematic review

Background: The potential benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in individuals with inherited arrhythmia syndromes is well known. However, it is not deprived of morbidity, in the form of inap-propriate therapies and other ICD-related complications.Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to estimate the rate of appropriate and inappropriate therapy, as well as other ICD-related complications, in individuals with inherited arrhythmia syndromes.Methods: A systematic review was performed, regarding appropriate and inappropriate therapy, and other ICD-related complications, in individuals with inherited arrhythmia syndromes (Brugada Syndrome, Cate-cholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia, Early Repolarization Syndrome, Long QT Syndrome and Short QT syndrome). Studies were identified by searching published papers in PubMed and Embase up to August 23rd, 2022. Results: From data gathered of 36 studies, with a total of 2750 individuals, during a mean follow-up time of 69 months, appropriate therapies occurred in 21% of the individuals and inappropriate therapies in 20% of the individuals. Concerning the other ICD-related complications, 456 complications were observed, amongst 2084 individuals (22%), with the most frequent being lead malfunction (46%), followed by infectious compli-cations (13%). Conclusions: ICD-related complications are not uncommon, especially when one considers the exposure time of young individuals. The incidence of inappropriate therapies was 20%, although lower rates were reported in recent publications. S-ICD is an effective alternative to transvenous ICD for sudden death prevention. The decision to implant an ICD should be individualized, taking into account the risk profile of each patient, as well as the possibility of complications.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.