Emotional stimuli similarly disrupt attention in both visual fields

被引:0
作者
Moeck, Ella K. K. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Zhao, Jenna L. L. [3 ,4 ]
Most, Steven B. B. [3 ]
Thomas, Nicole A. A. [2 ]
Takarangi, Melanie K. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Educ Psychol & Social Work, Bedford Pk, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Dept Dev Disabil Neuropsychiat, Discipline Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Parkville, Vic 3121, Australia
关键词
emotion; visual attention; hemispheric asymmetries; emotion-induced blindness; SPATIAL ATTENTION; PSEUDONEGLECT; BIAS; SCENES; TASK; ASYMMETRIES; MODULATION; ADVANTAGE; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2023.2187353
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People often need to filter relevant from irrelevant information. Irrelevant emotional distractors interrupt this process. But does the degree to which emotional distractors disrupt attention depend on which visual field they appear in? We thought it might for two reasons: (1) people pay slightly more attention to the left than the right visual field, and (2) some research suggests the right-hemisphere (which, in early visual processing, receives left visual field input) has areas specialised for processing emotion. Participants viewed a rapid image-stream in each visual field and reported the rotation of an embedded neutral target preceded by a negative or neutral distractor. We predicted that the degree to which negative (vs. neutral) distractors impaired target detection would be larger when targets appeared in the left than the right stream. This hypothesis was supported, but only when the distractor and target could appear in the same or opposite stream as each other (Experiments 2a-b), not when they always appeared in the same stream as each other (Experiments 1a-1b). However, this effect was driven by superior left-stream accuracy following neutral distractors, and similar left- and right-stream accuracy following negative distractors. Emotional distractors therefore override visuospatial asymmetries and disrupt attention, regardless of visual field.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 649
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness [J].
Anderson, AK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (02) :258-281
[2]   Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes [J].
Asanowicz, Dariusz ;
Smigasiewicz, Kamila ;
Verleger, Rolf .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[3]   Hemispheric asymmetry in the efficiency of attentional networks [J].
Asanowicz, Dariusz ;
Marzecova, Anna ;
Jaskowski, Piotr ;
Wolski, Piotr .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2012, 79 (02) :117-128
[4]   Emotional content overrides spatial attention [J].
Bekhtereva, Valeria ;
Craddock, Matt ;
Mueller, Matthias M. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 58 (08)
[5]   The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations [J].
Bourne, Victoria J. .
LATERALITY, 2006, 11 (04) :373-393
[6]   PSEUDONEGLECT - EFFECTS OF HEMISPACE ON A TACTILE LINE BISECTION TASK [J].
BOWERS, D ;
HEILMAN, KM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1980, 18 (4-5) :491-498
[7]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[8]   Lateralized discrimination of emotional scenes in peripheral vision [J].
Calvo, Manuel G. ;
Rodriguez-Chinea, Sandra ;
Fernandez-Martin, Andres .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 233 (03) :997-1006
[9]   Retinotopy of emotion: Perception of negatively valenced stimuli presented at different spatial locations as revealed by event-related potentials [J].
Carretie, Luis ;
Mendez-Bertolo, Constantino ;
Bodalo, Cristina ;
Hernandez-Lorca, Maria ;
Fernandez-Folgueiras, Uxia ;
Fondevila, Sabela ;
Gimenez-Fernande, Tamara .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2020, 41 (07) :1711-1724
[10]   Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review [J].
Carretie, Luis .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 14 (04) :1228-1258