How do environmental taxes influence the effect of tourism on environmental performance? Evidence from EU countries

被引:12
作者
Usman, Ojonugwa [1 ]
Alola, Andrew Adewale [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Ticaret Univ, Econ & Finance Applicat & Res Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Res Digitalizat & Sustainabil, Elverum, Norway
[3] South Ural State Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, Chelyabinsk, Russia
关键词
Environmental taxes; environmental performance; tourism; panel threshold regression; EU-28; countries; CARBON TAX; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY; CONSUMPTION; POLLUTION; TAXATION;
D O I
10.1080/13683500.2022.2157706
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Evidence of the accumulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) over the years is placing greater emphasis on the use of taxes to achieve a sustainable environment. This study evaluates the effectiveness of environmental taxes in mitigating the effect of tourism on environmental performance in EU-28 countries for the period 2002-2019. The empirical results of the panel threshold regression model suggest that the effect of tourism on environmental performance is dependent on the level of environmental taxes. Particularly, the effect of tourism on environmental performance is positive and insignificant when environmental taxes are below the threshold level of 9.43%. However, once environmental taxes cross a threshold level, tourism would improve environmental performance. This suggests a significant difference in the way tourism influences environmental performance during periods of lower and higher environmental taxes. These findings, therefore, provide insights to policymakers and other stakeholders on the use of environmental taxes as an instrument to avert environmental degradation, and thus mitigate global warming and other significant climate changes.
引用
收藏
页码:4034 / 4051
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]   Quantiles via moments [J].
Machado, Jose A. F. ;
Silva, J. M. C. Santos .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2019, 213 (01) :145-173
[42]  
Månsson K, 2017, Communications in Statistics Case Studies Data Analysis and Applications, V3, P55, DOI [10.1080/23737484.2018.1424589, 10.1080/23737484.2018.1424589, DOI 10.1080/23737484.2018.1424589]
[43]   The impact of the Australian carbon tax on the tourism industry [J].
Meng, Sam ;
Tien Pham .
TOURISM ECONOMICS, 2017, 23 (03) :506-522
[44]   Empirical Research of Public Acceptance on Environmental Tax: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Muhammad, Izlawanie ;
Hasnu, Norfakhirah Nazihah Mohd ;
Ekins, Paul .
ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (10)
[45]   Effects of tourism, financial development, and renewable energy on environmental performance in EU-28: does institutional quality matter? [J].
Musa, Muhammad Sani ;
Jelilov, Gylych ;
Iorember, Paul Terhemba ;
Usman, Ojonugwa .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (38) :53328-53339
[46]   Tourism and environmental taxes. With special reference to the "Balearic ecotax" [J].
Palmer, T ;
Riera, A .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 24 (06) :665-674
[47]   Mineral taxes and the local public goods provision in mining communities [J].
Paredes, Dusan ;
Rivera, Nathaly M. .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2017, 53 :328-339
[48]   THE ROLE OF CARBON TAXES IN ADJUSTING TO GLOBAL WARMING [J].
PEARCE, D .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1991, 101 (407) :938-948
[49]   Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis [J].
Pedroni, P .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2004, 20 (03) :597-625
[50]   A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence [J].
Pesaran, M. Hashem .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (02) :265-312