Analysis of safety and security challenges and opportunities related to cyber-physical systems

被引:43
作者
El-Kady, Ahmed Hamdy [1 ]
Halim, Syeda [1 ]
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mary Kay OConnor Proc Safety Ctr, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Cyber-physical systems; Process safety and security; Process risk management; Process failure analysis; Process fault diagnosis; Process automation; DATA INJECTION ATTACKS; INDUSTRIAL INTERNET; CASCADING FAILURES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DIGITAL TWIN; FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; INHERENT SAFETY; POWER-SYSTEMS; THINGS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2023.03.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A cyber-physical system (CPS) is an interconnected physical system that can be monitored, controlled, and operated remotely. A systems-based analysis of CPS is critical for enhancing operational safety and security. Such analysis is particularly important in light of the evolving Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) which is largely driven by CPS, Internet of Things (IoT), algorithmic systems, automation, and smart manufacturing. As a result of industries' and societies' growing dependence on CPSs, their safe and secure applications need to be scrutinized to avoid any threats or harm to processes and human lives. In order to achieve this target, the current work analyzes the literature to investigate challenges and opportunities present in the CPSs. The analysis at-tempts to answer the following Research Questions (RQs): (RQ1) What are the prominent trends in the field of safety and security of CPSs? (RQ2) What are the opportunities in Industry 4.0 technologies related to safety? (RQ3) What characteristics of CPSs are likely to cause safety and security issues? (RQ4) What are the emerging safety and security issues introduced by CPSs? (RQ5) How were these issues addressed in the literature? CPSs can address some traditional safety issues due to characteristics like high efficiency and control. However, a CPS is challenged by heterogeneity, dependencies, complexity, unattended nature, increased machine intelligence, autonomous reconfiguration, and uncertainties. Safety and security challenges include opaque system failure, complex socio-technical system, human-machine interface, cyber-physical attacks, unsecured remote configu-ration, lack of standards, and resilience. The paper is structured under the following key headings: bibliometric results, opportunities from Industry 4.0 technologies, issues introduced by Industry 4.0 technologies, literature proposed solutions, and research challenges. Based on the assessment of about 900 relevant publications extracted from two databases (Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection and Engineering village (EV)), the docu-ments were categorized into eight major divisions: (i) Safety Opportunities, (ii) Hazardous Characteristics, (iii) Fault Occurrence, (iv) Cyber-physical attacks, (v) Human factors, (vi) occupational Health and safety, (vii) standards, and (viii) Reliability and resiliency. Proactive strategies were classified under four options: identifi-cation, evaluation, prevention, and management. The paper also raises some research needs and unanswered questions that require further analysis to address how security and safety mechanisms can introduce more complexity in the system that can lead to new risks. The paper concludes by emphasizing digital process safety as part of the engineering curriculum to address the process industry's need for digital solutions and to make process safety learning a conscious choice.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 413
页数:30
相关论文
共 316 条
[1]   Decoy-based Moving Target defense Against Cyber-physical Attacks On Smart Grid [J].
Abdelwahab, Ahmed ;
Lucia, Walter ;
Youssef, Amr .
2020 IEEE ELECTRIC POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (EPEC), 2020,
[2]   A Secure Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Framework for Resource Management in Smart Manufacturing [J].
Abuhasel, Khaled Ali ;
Khan, Mohammad Ayoub .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :117354-117364
[3]   Investigating the effect of inherent safety principles on system reliability in process design [J].
Ade, Nilesh ;
Liu, Guanlan ;
Al-Douri, Ahmad F. ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. ;
Mannan, M. Sam .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2018, 117 :100-110
[4]   Occupational health and safety risk assessment in the domain of Industry 4.0 [J].
Adem, Aylin ;
Cakit, Erman ;
Dagdeviren, Metin .
SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 2 (05)
[5]   From Design to Invariants: Detecting Attacks on Cyber Physical Systems [J].
Adepu, Sridhar ;
Mathur, Aditya .
2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY COMPANION (QRS-C), 2017, :533-540
[6]  
Aigner A., 2020, 2020 IEEE INT C SENS, P1
[7]  
Aigner A., 2020 IEEE C IND CYB, P87
[8]   A Security Scoring Framework to Quantify Security in Cyber-Physical Systems [J].
Aigner, Andreas ;
Khelil, Abdelmajid .
2021 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, ICPS, 2021, :199-206
[9]   A Semantic Model-based Security Engineering Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems [J].
Aigner, Andreas ;
Khelil, Abdelmajid .
2020 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRUST, SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (TRUSTCOM 2020), 2020, :1826-1833
[10]   Analysis of information flow security in cyber-physical systems [J].
Akella, Ravi ;
Tang, Han ;
McMillin, Bruce M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, 2010, 3 (3-4) :157-173