Ovarian preservation compared to oophorectomy in premenopausal women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial Cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:0
作者
Hernandez-Zepeda, Miriam L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Munro, Elizabeth G. [1 ]
Caughey, Aaron B. [1 ]
Bruegl, Amanda S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, SW Sam Jackson Paarak Rd, Portland, OR 97339 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97339 USA
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Early; -stage; Oophorectomy; Ovarian preservation; Premenopausal women; Quality -adjusted life years; YOUNG-WOMEN; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; CONSERVATION; SURVIVAL; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; RECURRENCE; STRATEGIES; MALIGNANCY; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.03.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. Standard treatment for endometrial cancer is a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph node assessment. In premenopausal women, removal of the ovaries may not be necessary and could increase the risk of all-cause mortality. We sought to estimate the outcomes, costs, and costeffectiveness of oophorectomy versus ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. Methods. A decision-analytic model was designed using TreeAge software comparing oophorectomy to ovarian preservation in premenopausal womenwith early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. We used a theoretical cohort of 10,600 women to represent our population of interest in the United States in 2021. Outcomes included cancer recurrences, ovarian cancer diagnoses, deaths, rates of vaginal atrophy, costs, and qualityadjusted life years (QALYs). The cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. Model inputs were derived from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results. Oophorectomy resulted in more deaths and higher rates of vaginal atrophy, while ovarian preservation resulted in 100 cases of ovarian cancer. Ovarian preservation resulted in lower costs and higher QALYsmaking it cost effective when compared to oophorectomy. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the probability of cancer recurrence after ovarian preservation and probability of developing ovarian cancerwere themost impactful variables in our model. Conclusion. Ovarian preservation is cost-effective in premenopausal women with early- stage, low-grade endometrial cancer when compared to oophorectomy. Ovarian preservation may prevent surgical menopause, whichmay improve quality of life and overall mortality without compromising oncologic outcomes, and should be strongly considered in premenopausal women with early stage disease. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 14
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Randomized double-blind trial of estrogen replacement therapy versus placebo in stage I or II endometrial cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Bundy, BN ;
Spirtos, NM ;
Bell, J ;
Mannel, RS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (04) :587-592
[2]   Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers [J].
Chan, John K. ;
Teoh, Deanna ;
Hu, Jessica M. ;
Shin, Jacob Y. ;
Osann, Kathryn ;
Kapp, Daniel S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 109 (03) :370-376
[3]   Breast cancer risk after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign indications [J].
Chow, Stephanie ;
Raine-Bennett, Tina ;
Samant, Navendu D. ;
Postlethwaite, Debbie A. ;
Holzapfel, Marie .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (06) :900.e1-900.e7
[4]   US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis [J].
Dottino, Joseph A. ;
Moss, Haley A. ;
Lu, Karen H. ;
Secord, Angeles A. ;
Havrilesky, Laura J. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (04) :795-802
[5]   Prospective cohort study comparing quality of life and sexual health outcomes between women undergoing robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer [J].
Ferguson, Sarah E. ;
Panzarella, Tony ;
Lau, Susie ;
Gien, Lilian T. ;
Samouelian, Vanessa ;
Giede, Christopher ;
Steed, Helen ;
Le, Tien ;
Renkosinski, Ben ;
Bernardini, Marcus Q. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 (03) :476-483
[6]   Recurrent early stage endometrial cancer: Patterns of recurrence and results of salvage therapy [J].
Francis, Samual R. ;
Ager, Bryan J. ;
Do, Olivia A. ;
Huang, Yu-Huei Jessica ;
Soisson, Andrew P. ;
Dodson, Mark K. ;
Werner, Theresa L. ;
Sause, William T. ;
Grant, Jonathan D. ;
Gaffney, David K. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 (01) :38-44
[7]  
Grann VR, 2002, J CLIN ONCOL, V20, P2520, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.101
[8]  
Jemal Ahmedin., 2009, CA Cancer J Clin, V59, P1, DOI 10.1002/caac.20073.Available
[9]   Ovarian preservation improves overall survival in young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer [J].
Jia, Peng ;
Zhang, Yan .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (35) :59940-59949
[10]   Outcomes of ovarian preservation in a cohort of premenopausal women with early-stage endometrial cancer: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study [J].
Lee, Taek Sang ;
Lee, Jung-Yun ;
Kim, Jae-Weon ;
Oh, Sohee ;
Seong, Seok Ju ;
Lee, Jong Min ;
Kim, Tae Jin ;
Cho, Chi Heum ;
Kim, Seok-Mo ;
Park, Chan-Yong .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (02) :289-293