Impacts of Tax and Flavor Tobacco Policies on San Francisco Bay Area Tobacco Prices

被引:0
作者
Pravosud, Vira [1 ]
Holmes, Louisa M. [2 ,3 ]
Lempert, Lauren K. [1 ]
Ling, Pamela M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Tobacco Control Res & Educ, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Geog, University Pk, PA USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Demog, University Pk, PA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Tobacco control; tax and policy; prevention; flavors; ENDS; UNITED-STATES; EXCISE TAXES; YOUNG-ADULTS; SMOKING; YOUTH; CIGARETTES; AMERICAN; PATTERNS; INDUSTRY; SALES;
D O I
10.1177/0193841X231164908
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Background: California Proposition 56 increased the state tobacco tax by $2 per cigarette pack effective April 1, 2017. Between 2015-2020 San Francisco (SF) and some cities in Alameda County enacted local flavored tobacco sales restrictions. SF also increased its Cigarette Litter Abatement Fee, from $0.20/pack in 2015 to $1.00 in 2020.Objectives: Compare the change in tobacco prices before (2015) and after (2019/20) the implementation of a $2 increase in tobacco excise tax and local flavored tobacco policies in SF and Alameda Counties.Research Design: Descriptive study of the pre-to-post policy analysis design. We drew a proportional random sample of retailers (N=463) in SF and Alameda Counties, by city. Using multivariable, single- and multiple-level linear regressions, we compared inflation-adjusted average tobacco prices in 2015 vs. 2019/20 by county and by flavor policy, accounting for socio-demographics.Measures: Change in inflation-adjusted average tobacco prices in 2015 vs. 2019/20 by county and flavor policy, accounting for socio-demographics.Results: Between 2015-2019/20, the increase in cigarette prices was higher than the $2 tax increase, and higher in SF than Alameda County (+$4.6 vs +$2.5). SF retailers stopped selling Newport menthol cigarettes and Blu brand menthol e-cigarettes in 2019/20. Adjusted average cigarette prices increased significantly more in SF and Alameda County cities with comprehensive or partial flavor policies versus cities without flavor policies (by $3.23 and $2.11).Conclusions: Local flavor policies affected menthol product availability and may have had positive spillover effects and indirectly increased pack prices.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 785
页数:23
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   E-cigarette Unit Sales, by Product and Flavor Type - United States, 2014-2020 [J].
Ali, Fatma Romeh M. ;
Diaz, Megan C. ;
Vallone, Donna ;
Tynan, Michael A. ;
Cordova, Jamie ;
Seaman, Elizabeth L. ;
Trivers, Katrina F. ;
Schillo, Barbara A. ;
Talley, Brandon ;
King, Brian A. .
MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2020, 69 (37) :1313-1318
[2]   Are California's Local Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Effective in Reducing the Retail Availability of Flavored Tobacco Products? A Multicomponent Evaluation [J].
Andersen-Rodgers, Elizabeth ;
Zhang, Xueying ;
Vuong, Tam D. ;
Hendrix, Liz ;
Edora, Cheryl ;
Williams, Rebecca J. ;
Groves, Lauren ;
Roeseler, April ;
Rogers, Todd ;
Voelker, David H. ;
Schleicher, Nina C. ;
Johnson, Trent O. ;
Henriksen, Lisa .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 2021, 45 (3-4) :134-165
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, CIG LITT ABATEMENTQU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, IMPOSITION CIGARETTE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CALIFORNIA REVENUE T
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SAN FRANCISCO HLTH C
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CAL PROP 56 TOB TAX
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, CALIFORNIA HLTH SAFE
[9]   Tobacco Industry Promotions and Pricing After Tax Increases: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents [J].
Apollonio, Dorie E. ;
Glantz, Stanton A. .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (06) :967-974
[10]   Association of Cigarette Sales With Comprehensive Menthol Flavor Ban in Massachusetts [J].
Asare, Samuel ;
Majmundar, Anuja ;
Westmaas, J. Lee ;
Bandi, Priti ;
Xue, Zheng ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Nargis, Nigar .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 182 (02) :231-234