The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance

被引:13
作者
Verkuyten, Maykel [1 ]
Yogeeswaran, Kumar [2 ]
Adelman, Levi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Dept Interdisciplinary Social Sci, Ercomer, Padualaan 14, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Tolerance; Intolerance; Intergroup Relations; Diversity; POLITICAL TOLERANCE; RELIGIOUS PRACTICES; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; PERCEIVED THREAT; MUSLIM ACTORS; ATTITUDES; PREJUDICE; MINORITY; CONTEXT; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1080/10463283.2022.2091326
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Living with cultural, religious, and ideological diversity inevitably creates situations where people are confronted with beliefs, values, or practices that they disapprove of. In such situations, people may consider reasons to nevertheless tolerate what they disapprove of (i.e., forbearance tolerance), or reject these (i.e., intolerance). In the current review, we consider empirical research on the processes of intergroup tolerance and consider different manifestations of (in)tolerance. Then we discuss recent work on the dual process model of tolerance, which considers intuitive versus deliberative objections to cultural, religious, and ideological differences, and how these can be overridden to produce tolerance. We then review literature on the boundaries of tolerance including the role of moralization and moral values, before considering individual difference factors and situations of threat that can hamper intergroup tolerance. We conclude by considering five areas ripe for future exploration on the social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 43
页数:43
相关论文
共 143 条
  • [21] A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice
    Crandall, CS
    Eshleman, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (03) : 414 - 446
  • [22] Political Intolerance, Right and Left
    Crawford, Jarret T.
    Pilanski, Jane M.
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 35 (06) : 841 - 851
  • [23] The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm
    Cushman, Fiery
    Young, Liane
    Hauser, Marc
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (12) : 1082 - 1089
  • [24] Understanding (in)tolerance of Muslim minority practices: a latent profile analysis
    Dangubic, M.
    Verkuyten, M.
    Stark, T. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, 2021, 47 (07) : 1517 - 1538
  • [25] Dangubic M., 2022, CRITICAL INCLUSIVENE
  • [26] The rejection and acceptance of Muslim minority practices: A person-centered approach
    Dangubic, Marija
    Yogeeswaran, Kumar
    Verkuyten, Maykel
    Sibley, Chris G.
    [J]. GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2023, 26 (02) : 380 - 405
  • [27] Rejecting Muslim or Christian religious practices in five West European countries: a case of discriminatory rejection?
    Dangubic, Marija
    Verkuyten, Maykel
    Stark, Tobias H.
    [J]. ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES, 2020, 43 (16) : 306 - 326
  • [28] At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives
    Ditto, Peter H.
    Liu, Brittany S.
    Clark, Cory J.
    Wojcik, Sean P.
    Chen, Eric E.
    Grady, Rebecca H.
    Celniker, Jared B.
    Zinger, Joanne F.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (02) : 273 - 291
  • [29] The Principle-Implementation Gap in Attitudes Towards Racial Equality (and How to Close It)
    Dixon, John
    Durrheim, Kevin
    Thomae, Manuela
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 : 91 - 126
  • [30] Djupe PA, 2015, SOC LOGIC POLIT, P183