Business Process Complexity Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Changhong [1 ]
Zhang, Dengliang [1 ]
Chen, Deyan [1 ]
Liu, Cong [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Zibo 255000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Complexity theory; Measurement; Business; Systematics; Bibliographies; Search problems; Quality assessment; Business process; complexity measurement; systematic literature review; CONTROL-FLOW COMPLEXITY; PROCESS MODELS; QUALITY METRICS; COHESION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3275764
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Business process complexity is an important factor that affects process quality and has a significant impact on the maintenance, optimization, and execution efficiency of processes. To review the application progress and trends of process complexity measurement in business process management, this study uses the systematic literature review (SLR) method to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the theoretical background, rationality, effectiveness, and comprehensiveness of 92 process complexity metrics. The findings showed that the measurement of process complexity primarily encompasses four dimensions: activity complexity, control-flow complexity, data-flow complexity, and resource complexity. However, most metrics consider only one or two aspects of complexity in the process and rely mainly on empirical validation, thus lacking theoretical validation support. Currently, the most popular and widely used complexity metric is Control Flow Complexity (CFC). Process complexity metrics mainly focus on measuring the complexity of process models, and the majority of them focus on activity complexity or control-flow complexity. The future research trend is to combine data mining techniques with process log data to analyze process complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:47940 / 47955
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DAGST SEM P SCHLOSS
[2]   The connection between process complexity of event sequences and models discovered by process mining [J].
Augusto, Adriano ;
Mendling, Jan ;
Vidgof, Maxim ;
Wurm, Bastian .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 598 :196-215
[3]   Property-based software engineering measurement [J].
Briand, LC ;
Morasca, S ;
Basili, VR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1996, 22 (01) :68-86
[4]  
Cardoso J., 2007, Software Process Improvement and Practice, V12, P35, DOI 10.1002/spip.302
[5]  
Cardoso J, 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, Vols 1 and 2, Proceedings, P803
[6]  
Cardoso J., 2005, 6th International Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support: Business Processes and Support Systems: Design for Flexibility, P67
[7]  
Cardoso J., 2006, PROC BUS PROCESS MAN, V4013, P117
[8]  
Cardoso J, 2005, PROC WRLD ACAD SCI E, V8, P213
[9]   Business process control-flow complexity: Metric, evaluation, and validation [J].
Cardoso, Jorge .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WEB SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 5 (02) :49-76
[10]   Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation [J].
Cardoso, Jorge .
2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, :167-173