Longitudinal evaluation of trifocal and extended depth of focus lenses implantation using standard automated perimetry parameters

被引:0
作者
Abe, Ricardo Yuji [1 ]
Barbosa da Silva, Maira Gomes [1 ]
Alves, Thiago Nogueira [1 ]
Tzelikis, Patrick Frensel de M. [1 ]
Hida, Wilson Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Oftalmol Brasilia, Ave L2 Sul,SGAS 607, BR-70200670 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Cataract surgery; Multifocal IOLs; PanOptix IOL; Symfony IOL; Visual performance; MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; CATARACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-022-02526-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate reliability and global indices parameters from standard automated perimetry (SAP) in normal eyes undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL). Methods Prospective study to evaluate the effect of trifocal IOL AcrySof IQ PanOptix (R) and extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF) Tecnis Symfony (R) IOL implantation on visual field parameters. Patients underwent SAP pre- and postoperatively. Reliability indices (false negative rate-FN, false positive rate-FP), global indices (foveal sensitivity threshold, visual field index-VFI, standard pattern deviation-PSD, mean deviation MD) and test duration were analyzed. Results A total of 23 eyes from 13 patients were in the trifocal IOL group and a total of 22 eyes from 14 patients were in the EDOF group. The following results were obtained by analyzing pre- and postoperative SAP of EDOF IOL: the rate of change of FN was 1.95/1.41% (p = 0.61); FP 1.64/1.27 (p = 0.60); MD - 1.60/- 1.08 dB (p = 0.15); foveal sensitivity was 34.5/33.9 dB (p = 0.41); VFI 98.5/98.4% (p > 0.99); PSD 1.85/1.86 (p = 0.07); and for test duration 305.81/298.36 s (p = 0.35); all respectively. Analysis of pre- and postoperative parameters of trifocal IOL were the rates of change of FN 1.22/1.83% (p = 0.29); FP 1.65/1.48% (p = 0.95); MD - 1.55/- 1.37 dB (p = 0.19); foveal sensitivity 33.9/34.9 dB (p = 0.47); VFI 98.6/98.3% (p = 0.62); PSD 1.58/2.05 (p = 0.02); and test duration 297.17/298.57 s (p = 0.87); all respectively. Conclusion We identified a change in the PSD parameters in the trifocal IOL group. No other significant changes were identified in SAP parameters after implantation of trifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix (R) and EDOF Tecnis Symfony (R) IOL. Longitudinal evaluation showed no changes in SAP after Trifocal and EDOF IOL implantation in normal subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Comparison of Patient Outcomes following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Guo, Yining ;
Wang, Yinhao ;
Hao, Ran ;
Jiang, Xiaodan ;
Liu, Ziyuan ;
Li, Xuemin .
JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 2021
[22]   Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (Alcon Acrysof IQ® PanOptix) and extended depth of focus lens (Tecnis® Symfony® ZXR00 lens) [J].
Mohsen Farvardin ;
Mohammadkarim Johari ;
Adel Attarzade ;
Feisal Rahat ;
Reza Farvardin ;
Zahra Farvardin .
International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 :567-573
[23]   Clinical outcome comparison: bilateral trifocal vs. mix–match extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lenses [J].
Banu Acar ;
Burcu Nurozler Tabakci .
International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 :3675-3686
[24]   Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses [J].
Hirasawa, Kazunori ;
Ito, Hikaru ;
Ohori, Yukari ;
Takano, Yui ;
Shoji, Nobuyuki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (10) :1559-1565
[25]   Tolerance to induced astigmatism of patients with trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation [J].
Mu, Jiancheng ;
Xiong, Tianxu ;
Xu, Feng ;
Guo, Wanyue ;
Sun, Chuhuan ;
Chen, Hao ;
Fan, Wei .
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
[26]   Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses a er cataract extraction (Review) [J].
Tavassoli, Shokufeh ;
Ziaei, Hadi ;
Yadegarfar, Mohammad E. ;
Gokul, Akilesh ;
Kernohan, Ashleigh ;
Evans, Jennifer R. ;
Ziaei, Mohammed .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, (07)
[27]   Comparison Between Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal IOL and Mix-and-Match Implantation of a Bifocal IOL and an Extended Depth of Focus IOL [J].
Song, Ji Eun ;
Khoramnia, Ramin ;
Son, Hyeck-Soo ;
Knorz, Michael C. ;
Choi, Chul Young .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 36 (08) :528-535
[28]   Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses [J].
Rementeria-Capelo, Laureano A. ;
Garcia-Perez, Jorge L. ;
Gros-Otero, Juan ;
Carrillo, Virginia ;
Perez-Lanzac, Juan ;
Contreras, Ines .
INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (01) :163-172
[29]   Extended Depth of Focus Versus Trifocal for Intraocular Lens Implantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Karam, Mohammad ;
Alkhowaiter, Nahlaa ;
Alkhabbaz, Ali ;
Aldubaikhi, Ahmed ;
Alsaif, Abdulmalik ;
Shareef, Eiman ;
Alazaz, Rand ;
Alotaibi, Abdulaziz ;
Koaik, Mona ;
Jabbour, Samir .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 251 :52-70
[30]   Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhong, Yueyang ;
Wang, Kai ;
Yu, Xiaoning ;
Liu, Xin ;
Yao, Ke .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)