Optimizing Land Use Identification With Social Networks: Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Aljeri, Munairah [1 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Inst Sci Res, Safat 13109, Kuwait
关键词
Classification; machine learning; land use; social network data; geographic location; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3325281
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of various Machine Learning (ML) classifiers for urban land use identification using social networks data. Two analysis cycles were conducted, with the second cycle introducing the "popularity index" parameter. The results demonstrate that incorporating the popularity index significantly improved the accuracy rates of all classifiers. The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) consistently outperformed other classifiers with a 0.9 accuracy, but the key highlight was the popularity index parameter, which optimized urban land use identification. By providing crucial contextual information and normalizing raw tweet counts, the popularity index proved vital for leveraging social media data in urban land use classification. Our findings support the value of social media data for analyzing urban land use dynamics and highlight ML classifiers with the popularity index as a promising approach to monitoring and understanding ever-changing patterns. This research makes a significant contribution to data-driven urban planning by highlighting the capacity of social media data to provide real-time and detailed insights into urban activities and land use patterns. These insights, in turn, can inform and enhance strategies for sustainable urban development and resource allocation, making them more informed and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:117067 / 117077
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Evolutionary Algorithms in Social Networks: A Comparative Machine Learning Perspective
    B. S. A. S. Rajita
    Pranay Tarigopula
    Phanindra Ramineni
    Ashank Sharma
    Subhrakanta Panda
    New Generation Computing, 2023, 41 : 401 - 444
  • [2] Application of Evolutionary Algorithms in Social Networks: A Comparative Machine Learning Perspective
    Rajita, B. S. A. S.
    Tarigopula, Pranay
    Ramineni, Phanindra
    Sharma, Ashank
    Panda, Subhrakanta
    NEW GENERATION COMPUTING, 2023, 41 (02) : 401 - 444
  • [3] Evaluation and comparison of the earth observing sensors in land cover/land use studies using machine learning algorithms
    Prasad, Pankaj
    Loveson, Victor Joseph
    Chandra, Priyankar
    Kotha, Mahender
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 68
  • [4] Machine learning algorithms for diabetes detection: a comparative evaluation of performance of algorithms
    Saxena, Surabhi
    Mohapatra, Debashish
    Padhee, Subhransu
    Sahoo, Goutam Kumar
    EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 16 (02) : 587 - 603
  • [5] Comparative evaluation of machine learning algorithms for phishing site detection
    Almujahid, Noura Fahad
    Haq, Mohd Anul
    Alshehri, Mohammed
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 10
  • [6] Classification of land use and land cover through machine learning algorithms: a literature review
    Tobar-Diaz, Rene
    Gao, Yan
    Mas, Jean Francois
    Cambron-Sandoval, Victor Hugo
    REVISTA DE TELEDETECCION, 2023, (62): : 1 - 19
  • [7] A comparative study of Machine learning algorithms for VANET networks
    Ftaimi, Sara
    Mazri, Tomader
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, INFORMATION SYSTEM & SECURITY (NISS'20), 2020,
  • [8] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Use in Breast Cancer Studies
    Easttom, Chuck
    Thapa, Sudip
    Lawson, Justin
    2020 10TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2020, : 412 - 416
  • [9] Machine Learning Algorithms for Urban Land Use Planning: A Review
    Chaturvedi, Vineet
    de Vries, Walter T.
    URBAN SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [10] Land cover and land use classification performance of machine learning algorithms in a boreal landscape using Sentinel-2 data
    Abdi, Abdulhakim Mohamed
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 57 (01) : 1 - 20