Development of a short form of the Cardiac Distress Inventory

被引:3
作者
Le Grande, Michael R. R. [1 ,2 ]
Murphy, Barbara M. M.
Rogerson, Michelle C. C.
Ski, Chantal F. F.
Amerena, John [5 ,6 ]
Smith, Julian A. A.
Hoover, Valerie [8 ]
Alvarenga, Marlies E. E. [1 ,7 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
Higgins, Rosemary O. O. [12 ]
Thompson, David R. R. [1 ,4 ,13 ]
Jackson, Alun C. C. [1 ,3 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Australian Ctr Heart Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Ctr Behav Change, Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Psychiat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Hosp Geelong, Deakin Sch Med, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[7] Victorian Heart Inst, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[8] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stanford, CA USA
[9] Federat Univ, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Berwick, Vic, Australia
[10] Monash Univ, Monash Hlth, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[11] Monash Univ, Dept Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[12] Univ Melbourne, Dept Physiotherapy, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[13] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Belfast, North Ireland
[14] Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Behav Hlth, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Psychological distress; Cardiovascular disease; Mental health; Cardiac distress inventory; Screening; SERIOUS MENTAL-ILLNESS; SCREENING SCALE; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12872-023-03439-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundCardiac distress may be viewed as a persistent negative emotional state that spans multiple psychosocial domains and challenges a patient's capacity to cope with living with their heart condition. The Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) is a disease-specific clinical assessment tool that captures the complexity of this distress. In busy settings such as primary care, cardiac rehabilitation, and counselling services, however, there is a need to administer briefer tools to aid in identification and screening. The aim of the present study was to develop a short, valid screening version of the CDI.MethodsA total of 405 participants reporting an acute coronary event in the previous 12 months was recruited from three hospitals, through social media and by direct enrolment on the study website. Participants completed an online survey which included the full version of the CDI and general distress measures including the Kessler K6, Patient Health Questionnaire-4, and Emotion Thermometers. Relationship of the CDI with these instruments, Rasch analysis model fit and clinical expertise were all used to select items for the short form (CDI-SF). Construct validity and receiver operating characteristics in relation to the Kessler K6 were examined.ResultsThe final 12 item CDI-SF exhibited excellent internal consistency indicative of unidimensionality and good convergent and discriminant validity in comparison to clinical status measures, all indicative of good construct validity. Using the K6 validated cutoff of & GE; 18 as the reference variable, the CDI-SF had a very high Area Under the Curve (AUC) (AUC = 0.913 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.94). A CDI-SF score of & GE; 13 was found to indicate general cardiac distress which may warrant further investigation using the original CDI.ConclusionThe psychometric findings detailed here indicate that the CDI-SF provides a brief psychometrically sound screening measure indicative of general cardiac distress, that can be used in both clinical and research settings.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FU
  • [2] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2021, Heart, stroke and vascular disease-Australian facts
  • [3] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300
  • [4] Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
    Boateng, Godfred O.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.
    Young, Sera L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [5] Bond T., 2015, Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9781315814698
  • [6] Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?
    Boone, William J.
    [J]. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 2016, 15 (04):
  • [7] Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure
    Hibbard, JH
    Mahoney, ER
    Stockard, J
    Tusler, M
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (06) : 1918 - 1930
  • [8] Higgins RO, 2007, J CARDIOPULM REHABIL, V27, P291
  • [9] Jackson AC., 2018, BR J CARDIAC NURS, V13, P286, DOI DOI 10.12968/BJCA.2018.13.6.286
  • [10] JACKSON AH, IN PRESS