Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams

被引:5
作者
Yun, Hyun-Do [1 ]
Choi, Ki-Bong [2 ]
Choi, Won-Chang [2 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Daejeon 34134, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Seongnam Si 13120, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
steel fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC); tensile strength; flexural toughness; energy absorption capacity; residual strength; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/ma16103789
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Specifications are available to quantify flexural performance of steel-fiber reinforced concrete beams with several parameters. Each specification provides different results. This study comparatively evaluates existing flexural beam test standards that are used to evaluate the flexural toughness of SFRC beam specimens. Two standards, EN-14651 and ASTM C1609, were followed to test SFRC beams under the three-point bending test (3PBT) and the four-point bending test (4PBT), respectively. Both normal tensile strength steel fiber (1200 MPa) and high tensile strength steel fiber (1500 MPa) in high-strength concrete were considered in this study. The reference parameters recommended in the two standards, which include equivalent flexural strength, residual strength, energy absorption capacity, and flexural toughness, were compared based on the tensile strength (normal or high) of the steel fiber in high-strength concrete. The 3PBT and 4PBT results indicate that both standard test methods yield similar results to quantify the flexural performance of SFRC specimens. However, unintended failure modes were observed for both standard test methods. The adopted correlation model shows that the flexural performance of SFRC is similar for 3PBTs and 4PBTs, but the residual strength obtained from the 3PBTs tends to be greater than that obtained from 4PBTs with an increase in the tensile strength of steel fiber.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ACI (American Concrete Institute), 2014, ACI 318-14, DOI DOI 10.14359/51716937
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, C39C39M21 ASTM INT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, C155020 ASTM INT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J PROC ARCHIT I KORE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Materials and Structures, V35, P579, DOI [DOI 10.1617/13884, 10.1007/BF02483127, DOI 10.1007/BF02483127]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ASTM International, P8, DOI [DOI 10.1520/C1698-09.2, DOI 10.1520/C1609]
[7]   Correlation between Flexural-Tensile Performance of Concrete Reinforced with Hooked-End Steel Fibers Using US and European Standards [J].
Carrillo, Julian ;
Vargas, Juan D. ;
Arroyo, Orlando .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 33 (08)
[8]   Comparing test methods for the mechanical characterization of fiber reinforced concrete [J].
Conforti, Antonio ;
Minelli, Fausto ;
Plizzari, Giovanni A. ;
Tiberti, Giuseppe .
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2018, 19 (03) :656-669
[9]  
EN, 2007, 14651A1 EN LOP DANSK
[10]   Correlation between the Barcelona test and the bending test in fibre reinforced concrete [J].
Galeote, Eduardo ;
Blanco, Ana ;
Cavalaro, Sergio H. P. ;
de la Fuente, Albert .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 152 :529-538