Intangible capital and productivity: Firm-level evidence from German manufacturing

被引:5
|
作者
Kaus, Wolfhard [1 ]
Slavtchev, Viktor [2 ,3 ]
Zimmermann, Markus [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Stat Off Germany, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
[2] Saxon State Minist Econ Affairs Labour & Transport, D-01097 Dresden, Germany
[3] Halle Inst Econ Res IWH, D-06108 Halle, Germany
[4] Fed Stat Off Germany, Gustav Stresemann Ring 11, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
来源
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES | 2023年 / 76卷 / 04期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
D24; O30; L60; INVESTMENT; TECHNOLOGY; LABOR;
D O I
10.1093/oep/gpad051
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article analyses the importance of intangible capital for firm productivity using comprehensive official firm-level data from German manufacturing. Both aggregate intangible investment and the share of investing firms increase over time. However, the distribution of intangible investment is heavily right-skewed, with many firms investing nothing or little and few investing a lot. This holds both for manufacturing overall and within narrowly defined industries. The group of top investors is highly persistent from year to year, and persistence increases over time. Production function estimations reveal a positive output elasticity of intangible capital which is small on average but increases substantially with firm-level intangible capital intensity. There are also effect heterogeneities by firm size and enterprise group membership, especially among high-intangible-intensive firms. Finally, considering intangibles as production factors reduces the measured dispersion of Total Factor Productivity (TFP), mainly by tightening the upper part of the TFP distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 996
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-Level Analysis
    Jens Matthias Arnold
    Katrin Hussinger
    Review of World Economics, 2005, 141 : 219 - 243
  • [2] Export behavior and firm productivity in German manufacturing: A firm-level analysis
    Arnold, JM
    Hussinger, K
    REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2005, 141 (02) : 219 - 243
  • [3] Trade, productivity, and innovation: Firm-level evidence from Malaysian manufacturing
    Lee, Cassey
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2011, 22 (04) : 284 - 294
  • [4] Is heterogeneous capital depreciation important for estimating firm-level productivity? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms
    Cheng, Dong
    Yu, Jian
    Zhang, Dayong
    Zheng, Wenping
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2020, 52
  • [5] The Impact of Intangible Capital on Productivity and Wages: Firm level evidence from Peru
    Castillo, Rafael
    Crespi, Gustavo
    ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA, 2024, 51 (01): : 45 - 84
  • [6] COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE CAPITAL: EVIDENCE FROM JAPANESE FIRM-LEVEL DATA
    Hosono, Kaoru
    Miyakawa, Daisuke
    Takizawa, Miho
    Yamanouchi, Kenta
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 65 (05): : 1293 - 1321
  • [7] Intangible capital as a production factor. Firm-level evidence from Austrian microdata
    Friesenbichler, Klaus
    Kuegler, Agnes
    Schieber-Knoebl, Julia
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [8] From firm-level imports to aggregate productivity: Evidence from Korean manufacturing firm data
    Ahn, JaeBin
    Choi, Moon Jung
    JAPAN AND THE WORLD ECONOMY, 2020, 56
  • [9] FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE ON PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENTIALS AND TURNOVER IN VIETNAMESE MANUFACTURING
    Doan Thi Thanh Ha
    Kiyota, Kozo
    JAPANESE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 65 (02) : 193 - 217
  • [10] Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Taiwanese manufacturing
    Aw, BY
    Chen, XM
    Roberts, MJ
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2001, 66 (01) : 51 - 86