Efficacy of Gabapentin For Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction

被引:5
作者
Mahadev, Ashna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hentati, Firas [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Miller, Brevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bao, James [1 ,6 ]
Perrin, Amber [1 ]
Kallogjeri, Dorina [1 ]
Piccirillo, Jay F. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Clin Outcomes Res Off, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Kansas City, MO USA
[3] Family Care Hlth Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL USA
[7] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 660 S Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8115, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SMELL;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoto.2023.2958
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Importance The COVID-19 pandemic affected millions of people and has become a dominant etiology of olfactory dysfunction (OD). No interventions with definitive clinical utility exist. Gabapentin represents a potential therapy for COVID-19-induced OD.Objective To evaluate the efficacy of oral gabapentin on olfactory function and olfaction-related quality of life in patients with COVID-19-induced OD.Design, Setting, and Participants This pilot double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted at Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis from January 7, 2022, to February 3, 2023. Adults with at least 3 months of OD after COVID-19 infection were eligible for inclusion. Participants with a history of other causes of OD or contraindications to gabapentin were excluded.Intervention Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral gabapentin or placebo. All patients underwent titration to a maximum tolerable dose, which was maintained during an 8-week fixed-dose (FD) phase then tapered off. Participants were monitored for 4 weeks following cessation of study medication.Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes were assessed following the 8-week FD phase and 4 weeks after taper completion. The primary outcome measure was the response rate determined by subjective improvement in OD on the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) after the FD phase. Other subjective and objective measures of olfactory function were also assessed as secondary outcome measures.Results Sixty-eight participants were enrolled (34 randomized to each arm), a total of 44 participants completed the FD period and 20 (45.4%) reported response to treatment with at least slight improvement in olfaction from baseline. Of those randomized, 51 (75%) were women and 56 were White (82%) with a mean (SD) age of 43 (13.5) years. Baseline demographic features including age, sex, and race and ethnicity were not significantly different between the groups. Of the 18 participants in the gabapentin group, 8 (44%) were responders and of the 26 participants in the placebo group, 12 (46%) reported response to treatment (percent difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -31.6% to 28.2%). Mixed-model analysis of all secondary outcome measures demonstrated no clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference between the gabapentin and placebo groups throughout the trial. There were no serious adverse events.Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, gabapentin was not associated with statistically significant or clinically meaningful benefit over placebo and likely is not an efficacious therapy for COVID-19-induced OD.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1119
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Anosmia in COVID-19: A Bumpy Road to Establishing a Cellular Mechanism
    Bilinska, Katarzyna
    Butowt, Rafal
    [J]. ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 11 (15): : 2152 - 2155
  • [2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC COVID DAT TRACK
  • [3] Olfactory training is helpful in postinfectious olfactory loss: A randomized, controlled, multicenter study
    Damm, Michael
    Pikart, Louisa K.
    Reimann, Heike
    Burkert, Silke
    Goektas, Oender
    Haxel, Boris
    Frey, Sabine
    Charalampakis, Ioannis
    Beule, Achim
    Renner, Berthold
    Hummel, Thomas
    Huettenbrink, Karl-Bernd
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (04) : 826 - 831
  • [4] Olfactory dysfunction in patients with head trauma
    Doty, RL
    Yousem, DM
    Pham, LT
    Kreshak, AA
    Geckle, R
    Lee, WW
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 54 (09) : 1131 - 1140
  • [5] UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SMELL IDENTIFICATION TEST - A RAPID QUANTITATIVE OLFACTORY FUNCTION-TEST FOR THE CLINIC
    DOTY, RL
    SHAMAN, P
    KIMMELMAN, CP
    DANN, MS
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 1984, 94 (02) : 176 - 178
  • [6] Dunlop BW, 2017, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/bs7030040
  • [7] Garcia JAP., INT FORUM ALLERGY RH
  • [8] Development and Validation of a Novel At-home Smell Assessment
    Gupta, Shruti
    Kallogjeri, Dorina
    Farrell, Nyssa F.
    Lee, Jake J.
    Smith, Harrison J.
    Khan, Amish M.
    Piccirillo, Jay F.
    [J]. JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 148 (03) : 252 - 258
  • [9] Intranasal Corticosteroid Treatment on Recovery of Long-Term Olfactory Dysfunction Due to COVID-19
    Hosseinpoor, Masoumeh
    Kabiri, Mona
    Haghi, Mohsen Rajati
    Soltani, Toktam Ghadam
    Rezaei, Alireza
    Faghfouri, Atiyeh
    Gholkhatmi, Zahra Poustchian
    Bakhshaee, Mehdi
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2022, 132 (11) : 2209 - 2216
  • [10] Efficacy of Combined Visual-Olfactory Training With Patient-Preferred Scents as Treatment for Patients With COVID-19 Resultant Olfactory Loss A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Khan, Amish M. M.
    Piccirillo, Jeffrey
    Kallogjeri, Dorina
    Piccirillo, Jay F. F.
    [J]. JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 149 (02) : 141 - 149