Broad ranges of investment configurations for renewable power systems, robust to cost uncertainty and near-optimality

被引:17
作者
Neumann, Fabian [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Tom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin TUB, Inst Energy Technol, Dept Digital Transformat Energy Syst, Einsteinufer 25 TA 8, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Automat & Appl Informat IAI, Hermann von Helmholtz Pl 1, D-76344 Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany
关键词
GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; GENERATE ALTERNATIVES; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; ELECTRICITY; PATHWAYS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.isci.2023.106702
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Achieving ambitious CO2 emission reduction targets requires energy system planning to accommodate societal preferences, such as transmission reinforce-ments or onshore wind parks, and acknowledge uncertainties in technology cost projections among many other uncertainties. Current models often solely minimize costs using a single set of cost projections. Here, we apply multi -objec-tive optimization techniques in a fully renewable European electricity system to explore trade-offs between system costs and technology deployment for elec-tricity generation, storage, and transport. We identify ranges of cost-efficient capacity expansion plans incorporating future technology cost uncertainties. For example, we find that some grid reinforcement, long-term storage, and large wind capacities are important to keep costs within 8% of least-cost solutions. Near the cost optimum a technologically diverse spectrum of options exist, allow-ing policymakers to make trade-offs regarding unpopular infrastructure. Our analysis comprises 50,000+ optimization runs, managed efficiently through multi-fidelity surrogate modeling techniques using sparse polynomial chaos expansions and low-discrepancy sampling.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INT EN WORKSH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, HDB UNCERTAINTY QUAN
[3]  
Brown T., 2018, J OPEN RES SOFTWARE, V6
[4]  
Danish Energy Agency, 2020, Technology data for generation of electricity and district heating
[5]   Modelling to generate alternatives with an energy system optimization model [J].
DeCarolis, J. F. ;
Babaee, S. ;
Li, B. ;
Kanungo, S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 79 :300-310
[6]   Impact of technology uncertainty on future low-carbon pathways in the UK [J].
Fais, Birgit ;
Keppo, Ilkka ;
Zeyringer, Marianne ;
Usher, Will ;
Daly, Hannah .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2016, 13-14 :154-168
[7]  
Fajraoui N, 2017, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1703.05312
[8]   Chaospy: An open source tool for designing methods of uncertainty quantification [J].
Feinberg, Jonathan ;
Langtangen, Hans Petter .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2015, 11 :46-57
[9]   Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change [J].
Gritsevskyi, A ;
Nakicenovic, N .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (13) :907-921
[10]   Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technology cost learning [J].
Heuberger, Clara F. ;
Rubin, Edward S. ;
Staffell, Iain ;
Shah, Nilay ;
Mac Dowell, Niall .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 204 :831-845