Dynamic human systems risk prognosis and control of lifting operations during prefabricated building construction

被引:5
作者
Sun, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Zhufu [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Ruoxin [3 ]
Tang, Pingbo [3 ]
Liu, Zhansheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Fac Architecture Civil & Transportat Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Technol, Key Lab Urban Secur & Disaster Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT | 2023年 / 14卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dynamic human systems; Risk control; Lifting operation; Modular construction; HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; SPACE EXPLORATION; TEAM; SIMULATION; WORKERS; SAFETY; ISSUES; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100143
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Prefabricated building construction (PBC) involves tedious lifting operations that require multiple cranes to work simultaneously in dynamic workspaces. Such operations involve frequent interactions among human, cyber, and physical environments, creating challenges for risk prognosis and control in dynamic contexts. Unfortunately, human errors pose challenges for achieving resilient lifting operation control. A dynamic human systems risk prognosis and control (DHS RP & C) approach is thus necessary for 1) capturing human errors and 2) controlling risks of human anomalies proactively. This study critically reviews opportunities and challenges for establishing the proposed approach. Challenges exist as 1) how to collect human/team behavior data during lifting opera-tions, 2) how to analyze these data for comprehending the impacts of human factors, and 3) how to respond to operational contingencies with risk control measures. In the end, the authors established a research roadmap for guiding future research activities toward automated lifting operations in PBC.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [1] Abdul-Rahman Hamzah, 2015, Journal of Construction Engineering, DOI 10.1155/2015/192742
  • [2] Role of Simulation in Construction Engineering and Management
    AbouRizk, Simaan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (10) : 1140 - 1153
  • [3] A Two-Stage Methodology Using K-NN and False-Positive Minimizing ELM for Nominal Data Classification
    Akusok, Anton
    Miche, Yoan
    Hegedus, Jozsef
    Nian, Rui
    Lendasse, Amaury
    [J]. COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2014, 6 (03) : 432 - 445
  • [4] Integrated production planning and control system for a panelized home prefabrication facility using simulation and RFID
    Altaf, Mohammed Sadiq
    Bouferguene, Ahmed
    Liu, Hexu
    Al-Hussein, Mohamed
    Yu, Haitao
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 85 : 369 - 383
  • [5] Dynamic planning of construction activities using hybrid simulation
    Alzraiee, Hani
    Zayed, Tarek
    Moselhi, Osama
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 49 : 176 - 192
  • [6] Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach to Integrate Field Submittals in Project Scheduling
    Awada, Mohamad
    Srour, F. Jordan
    Srour, Issam M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 37 (01)
  • [7] Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: Machine and deep learning methods and applications
    Baduge, Shanaka Kristombu
    Thilakarathna, Sadeep
    Perera, Jude Shalitha
    Arashpour, Mehrdad
    Sharafi, Pejman
    Teodosio, Bertrand
    Shringi, Amkit
    Mendis, Priyan
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 141
  • [8] Need for Structure as Asset and Liability in Dynamic Team Decision-Making
    Beersma, Bianca
    Greer, Lindred L.
    Dalenberg, Sander
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
    [J]. GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 20 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [9] Team Composition Issues for Future Space Exploration: A Review and Directions for Future Research
    Bell, Suzanne T.
    Brown, Shanique G.
    Abbenn, Daniel R.
    Outland, Neal B.
    [J]. AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2015, 86 (06) : 548 - 556
  • [10] Boring R., 2013, Digital Full-Scope Simulation of a Conventional Nuclear Power Plant Control Room, Phase 2: Installation of a Reconfigurable Simulator to Support Nuclear Plant Sustainability