Improving conservation outcomes in agricultural landscapes: farmer perceptions of native vegetation on the Yorke Peninsula, South Australia

被引:9
作者
Amato, Bianca [1 ,2 ]
Petit, Sophie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, UniSA STEM, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Kangaroo Isl Res Stn, Penneshaw, SA 5222, Australia
关键词
Agricultural advisor; Agronomists; Biodiversity conservation on farm; Long-term planning; Roadside vegetation; Social capital; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADOPTION; KNOWLEDGE; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; CHALLENGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-023-10458-y
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
With agriculture the primary driver of biodiversity loss, farmers are increasingly expected to produce environmental outcomes and protect biodiversity. However, lack of attention to the way farmers perceive native vegetation has resulted in conservation targets not being met. The Yorke Peninsula (YP), South Australia, is an agricultural landscape where < 5% of vegetation remains on private properties and roadsides. To identify YP farmers' barriers to vegetation conservation on the roadside and private properties, we interviewed 35 farmers representing 56,980 ha of farms (11% of the YP area) and three agronomists. We identified five barriers to conservation: (1) negative perceptions of roadside vegetation and (2) management bodies; (3) absence of effective conservation programs making use of farmers' motivations; (4) > 50% farmers perceived that long-term planning was for <= 30 years, not enough time to promote ecosystem conservation; (5) a lack of natural resource management information for farmers-as a result, farmers relied on their own experience to manage vegetation. Furthermore, most farmers depended on agronomists, who generally had no stake in biodiversity conservation. We recommend that (1) the Local Council restore social capital by liaising with farmers to promote roadside vegetation (2) long-term farmer-led conservation action be established and supported by Government and industry acting as facilitators rather than project managers; (3) a change in policy and training promote the involvement of agronomists in conservation and its management on private properties; (4) all levels of Government develop schemes to demonstrate the tangible benefits of native vegetation as habitat for wildlife; (5) on-farm conservation be celebrated as successful farming.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1557
页数:21
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Algan Y, 2014, HBK ECON, P49, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00002-2
[3]   Farmers' Preferences and Social Capital Regarding Agri-environmental Schemes to Protect Birds [J].
Allo, Maria ;
Loureiro, Maria L. ;
Iglesias, Eva .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (03) :672-689
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NVIVO 11
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BIODIVERSITY ENV CHA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BUSHF LEG AM ACT
[8]   Importance of building bridging and linking social capital in adapting to changes in UK agricultural policy [J].
Arnott, David ;
Chadwick, David R. ;
Wynne-Jones, Sophie ;
Dandy, Norman ;
Jones, David L. .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 83 :1-10
[9]   The role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management [J].
Auer, A. ;
Von Below, J. ;
Nahuelhual, L. ;
Mastrangelo, M. ;
Gonzalez, A. ;
Gluch, M. ;
Vallejos, M. ;
Staiano, L. ;
Laterra, P. ;
Paruelo, J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 107 :168-178
[10]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2016, CENS QUICKST