Individual characteristics associated with risk and time preferences: A multi country representative survey

被引:13
作者
Meissner, Thomas [1 ]
Gassmann, Xavier [2 ]
Faure, Corinne [3 ]
Schleich, Joachim [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Tongersestr 53, NL-6211 LM Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, CEREN, EA 7477, Burgundy Sch Business, 29 Rue Sambin, F-21000 Dijon, France
[3] Grenoble Ecole Management, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[4] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Preference elicitation; Risk preferences; Loss aversion; Time preferences; Present bias; LOSS AVERSION; PROSPECT-THEORY; ECONOMIC PREFERENCES; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELICITING RISK; DISCOUNT RATES; ATTITUDES; GENDER; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s11166-022-09383-y
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper empirically analyzes how individual characteristics are associated with risk aversion, loss aversion, time discounting, and present bias. To this end, we conduct a large-scale demographically representative survey across eight European countries. We elicit preferences using incentivized multiple price lists and jointly estimate preference parameters to account for their structural dependencies. Our findings suggest that preferences are linked to a variety of individual characteristics such as age, gender, and income as well as some personal values. We also report evidence on the relationship between cognitive ability and preferences. Incentivization, stake size, and the order of presentation of binary choices matter, underlining the importance of controlling for these factors when eliciting economic preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 107
页数:31
相关论文
共 176 条
  • [11] Anderson J.T, 2021, J REAL ESTATE FINANC, P1
  • [12] Robust inference in risk elicitation tasks
    Andersson, Ola
    Holm, Hakan J.
    Tyran, Jean-Robert
    Wengstrom, Erik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2020, 61 (03) : 195 - 209
  • [13] RISK AVERSION RELATES TO COGNITIVE ABILITY: PREFERENCES OR NOISE?
    Andersson, Ola
    Holm, Hakan J.
    Tyran, Jean-Robert
    Wengstrom, Erik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2016, 14 (05) : 1129 - 1154
  • [14] Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets
    Andreoni, James
    Sprenger, Charles
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) : 3333 - 3356
  • [15] Monotone Stochastic Choice Models: The Case of Risk and Time Preferences
    Apesteguia, Jose
    Ballester, Miguel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 126 (01) : 74 - 106
  • [16] Risk Preferences and Prenatal Exposure to Sex Hormones for Ladinos
    Aycinena, Diego
    Baltaduonis, Rimvydas
    Rentschler, Lucas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [17] Assortative mating on risk attitude
    Bacon, Philomena M.
    Conte, Anna
    Moffatt, Peter G.
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2014, 77 (03) : 389 - 401
  • [18] Bajtelsmit VL., 2001, Risk preferences and the investment decisions of older Americans
  • [19] Bansback Nick, 2016, CMAJ Open, V4, pE284, DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20150071
  • [20] Wildfires in Poland: The impact of risk preferences and loss aversion on environmental choices
    Bartczak, Anna
    Chilton, Susan
    Meyerhoff, Jurgen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 116 : 300 - 309