Telework in public organizations: A systematic review and research agenda

被引:19
作者
Mele, Valentina [1 ]
Belardinelli, Paolo [2 ]
Belle, Nicola [3 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
[2] Indiana Univ, ONeill Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Scuola Super Sant Anna, Inst Management, Management & Hlth Lab, Pisa, Italy
关键词
US FEDERAL-AGENCIES; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; WORK; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; LEADERSHIP; COLLEAGUES; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1111/puar.13734
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
After a relatively slow policy intervention and scholarly take-up, recent developments created the urgency for massive efforts to implement and regulate telework in public organizations. We contribute to this debate through a systematic review of 120 studies across disciplines. Findings from our analysis reveal a few established antecedents of telework, including individual characteristics like family responsibilities and expected productivity, but also organizational aspects like supportive leadership, and contextual features like natural disasters. Self-reported productivity and work-life balance stand out as telework's most widely studied outcomes, although evidence is often conflicting when coming to the effects of telework. We present our results by distinguishing pre- and post-pandemic findings. Complementing our systematic review, we engage in a generative exercise by identifying emerging debates on telework in public bureaucracies. We conclude by indicating future research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1666
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[51]   Researching Finnish library responses to Covid-19 digital literacy challenges through the employment of reflective practice [J].
Rivera-Macias, Berenice ;
Casselden, Biddy .
JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2024, 56 (01) :98-119
[52]   Public versus private information systems - Do they differ in important ways? A review and empirical test [J].
Rocheleau, B ;
Wu, LF .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2002, 32 (04) :379-397
[53]   Rural telework: case studies from the Australian outback [J].
Simpson, L ;
Daws, L ;
Pini, B ;
Wood, L .
NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2003, 18 (02) :115-126
[54]  
Singh AR, 2021, PAC BUS REV INT, V13, P36
[55]   The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: lessons from the public sector [J].
Taskin, Laurent ;
Edwards, Paul .
NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2007, 22 (03) :195-207
[56]  
Teiusan S. C., 2022, ECOFORUM J, V11
[57]   The bright and dark side of smart working in the public sector: employees' experiences before and during COVID-19 [J].
Todisco, Lucio ;
Tomo, Andrea ;
Canonico, Paolo ;
Mangia, Gianluigi .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2023, 61 (13) :85-102
[58]  
United States Office of Personnel Management, 2022, STAT TEL FED GOV REP
[59]   The Moderating Roles of Remote, Hybrid, and Onsite Working on the Relationship between Work Engagement and Organizational Identification during the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Uru, Fahriye Oben ;
Gozukara, Ebru ;
Tezcan, Lale .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
[60]   Public servants working from home during the pandemic: Who gained and who lost? [J].
Williamson, Sue ;
Colley, Linda ;
Huybers, Twan ;
Tani, Massimiliano .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2024, 83 (03) :288-307