High-dose (40 mg) versus low-dose (20 mg) prednisolone for treating sarcoidosis: a randomised trial (SARCORT trial)

被引:13
|
作者
Dhooria, Sahajal [1 ]
Sehgal, Inderpaul Singh [1 ]
Agarwal, Ritesh [1 ]
Muthu, Valliappan [1 ]
Prasad, Kuruswamy Thurai [1 ]
Dogra, Pooja [1 ]
Debi, Uma [2 ]
Garg, Mandeep [2 ]
Bal, Amanjit [3 ]
Gupta, Nalini [4 ]
Aggarwal, Ashutosh Nath [1 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Pulm Med, Chandigarh, India
[2] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Radiodiag & Imaging, Chandigarh, India
[3] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Histopathol, Chandigarh, India
[4] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Cytol & Gynecol Pathol, Chandigarh, India
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PULMONARY SARCOIDOSIS; CORTICOSTEROID-THERAPY; STATEMENT; FATIGUE; 5-YEAR;
D O I
10.1183/13993003.00198-2023
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Current guidelines recommend 20-40 mg center dot day-1 of oral prednisolone for treating pulmonary sarcoidosis. Whether the higher dose (40 mg center dot day-1) can improve outcomes remains unknown. Methods We conducted an investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03265405). Consecutive subjects with pulmonary sarcoidosis were randomised (1:1) to receive either high-dose (40 mg center dot day-1 initial dose) or low-dose (20 mg center dot day-1 initial dose) oral prednisolone, tapered over 6 months. The primary outcome was the frequency of relapse or treatment failure at 18 months from randomisation. Key secondary outcomes included the time to relapse or treatment failure, overall response, change in forced vital capacity (FVC, in litres) at 6 and 18 months, treatment-related adverse effects and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores using the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire and Fatigue Assessment Scale.Findings We included 86 subjects (43 in each group). 42 and 43 subjects completed treatment in the high dose and low-dose groups, respectively, while 37 (86.0%) and 41 (95.3%), respectively, completed the 18-month follow-up. 20 (46.5%) subjects had relapse or treatment failure in the high-dose group and 19 (44.2%) in the low-dose group (p=0.75). The mean time to relapse/treatment failure was similar between the groups (high-dose 307 days versus low-dose 269 days, p=0.27). The overall response, the changes in FVC at 6 and 18 months and the incidence of adverse effects were also similar. Changes in HRQoL scores did not differ between the study groups. Interpretation High-dose prednisolone was not superior to a lower dose in improving outcomes or the HRQoL in sarcoidosis and was associated with similar adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LOW-DOSE PREDNISONE AND CICLOSPORIN VERSUS HIGH-DOSE PREDNISONE IN NEPHROTIC SYNDROME OF CHILDREN
    TEJANI, A
    SUTHANTHIRAN, M
    POMRANTZ, A
    NEPHRON, 1991, 59 (01): : 96 - 99
  • [22] LOW-DOSE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE INSULIN THERAPY FOR HYPERGLYCEMIC COMA IN DIABETES-MELLITUS - A COMPARATIVE TRIAL
    TERESCHENKO, IV
    KLINICHESKAYA MEDITSINA, 1990, 68 (06): : 133 - 136
  • [23] Low-dose versus high-dose methylprednisolone for children with severepneumonia (MCMP): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    XuBaoping
    PengXiaoxia
    YaoYao
    YinJu
    ChenLanqin
    LiuJun
    WangHao
    GaoLiwei
    ShenAdong
    ShenKunling
    儿科学研究(英文), 2018, (03) : 176 - 177-178-179-180-181-182-183
  • [24] THE USE OF OPIATE ANTAGONISTS IN TREATING BULIMIA - A STUDY OF LOW-DOSE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE NALTREXONE
    JONAS, JM
    GOLD, MS
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1988, 24 (02) : 195 - 199
  • [25] Vasopressin Versus Terlipressin and Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Steroids
    Mentzelopoulos, Spyros D.
    Vrettou, Charikleia S.
    Zakynthinos, Spyros G.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (08) : 794 - 795
  • [26] HIGH-DOSE VERSUS LOW-DOSE STRATEGIES IN THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
    KANE, JM
    RIFKIN, A
    WOERNER, M
    REARDON, G
    KREISMAN, D
    BLUMENTHAL, R
    BORENSTEIN, M
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN, 1985, 21 (03) : 533 - 537
  • [27] HIGH-DOSE VERSUS LOW-DOSE OXYTOCIN FOR LABOR STIMULATION
    SATIN, AJ
    LEVENO, KJ
    SHERMAN, ML
    BREWSTER, DS
    CUNNINGHAM, FG
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 80 (01): : 111 - 116
  • [28] High-dose versus low-dose tranexamic acid for paediatric craniosynostosis surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Goobie, Susan M.
    Staffa, Steven J.
    Meara, John G.
    Proctor, Mark R.
    Tumolo, Miriam
    Cangemi, Giuliana
    Disma, Nicola
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (03) : 336 - 345
  • [29] Effects of high-dose versus low-dose losartan on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HEAAL study): a randomised, double-blind trial
    Konstam, Marvin A.
    Neaton, James D.
    Dickstein, Kenneth
    Drexler, Helmut
    Komajda, Michel
    Martinez, Felipe A.
    Riegger, Gunter A. J.
    Malbecq, William
    Smith, Ronald D.
    Guptha, Soneil
    Poole-Wilson, Philip A.
    LANCET, 2009, 374 (9704): : 1840 - 1848
  • [30] Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis -: The Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide
    Houssiau, FA
    Vasconcelos, C
    D'Cruz, D
    Sebastiani, GD
    Garrido, ED
    Danieli, MG
    Abramovicz, D
    Blockmans, D
    Mathieu, A
    Direskeneli, H
    Galeazzi, M
    Gül, A
    Levy, Y
    Petera, P
    Popovic, R
    Petrovic, R
    Sinico, RA
    Cattaneo, R
    Font, J
    Depresseux, G
    Cosyns, JP
    Cervera, R
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (08): : 2121 - 2131