Diagnosis of single umbilical artery and risk of foetal congenital malformations by prenatal ultrasound: a retrospective study

被引:4
作者
Yu, Junjin [1 ]
Wu, Qingqin [2 ]
Kong, Fanbin [3 ]
Ning, Yan [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Dongshan Hosp, Dept Pharm, Linyi, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Dept Ultrasound, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Dept Pathol, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, 128,Shenyang Rd, Shanghai 200082, Peoples R China
关键词
Single umbilical artery; Foetal malformation; Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasound; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; PREGNANCIES; FETUSES; MARKERS; SIDE;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-024-06375-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Single umbilical artery (SUA) is strongly associated with foetal structural abnormalities; however, the exact pattern of this association has not been described. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of malformations in singleton pregnancies with SUA in China and to study the association between the absent side of the umbilical artery and foetal malformations. Methods This was a retrospective study of singleton pregnancies for which routine first-trimester anatomical screening was performed at 11(+ 0)-13(+ 6) gestational weeks and, if the pregnancy continued, a second-trimester scan was performed at 20(+ 0)-24(+ 0) weeks. Data were extracted from records at the referral centre, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, between January 2011 and April 2019 (n = 47,894). Using logistic regression, the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for malformations associated with SUA. Results The incidence of SUA in our study was 2.0% (970/47,894). Of all foetuses with SUA, 387 (39.9%) had structural malformations. The malformation type varied, with cardiovascular complications being the most common. A robust association was observed between SUA and oesophageal stenosis or atresia (OR: 25.33), followed by cardiovascular (OR: 9.98-24.02), scoliosis (OR: 18.62), genitourinary (OR: 2.45-15.66), and brain malformations (OR: 4.73-9.12). The absence of the left umbilical artery (n = 445, 45.9%) was consistent with that of the right umbilical artery (n = 431, 44.4%). Furthermore, a significantly higher rate of an absent right than the left umbilical artery (p<0.01) was observed in SUA with foetal abnormalities than in SUA with no malformations. Conclusions Overall, we observed a higher risk of various specific malformations in foetuses with SUA, and a strong association between SUA and oesophageal stenosis or atresia. The absence of the right umbilical artery was most common in foetuses with SUA and structural malformations. This study provides a reference for ultrasonographers in conducting foetal structural screening for pregnant women with SUA.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Association of Isolated Single Umbilical Artery With Small for Gestational Age and Preterm Birth [J].
Battarbee, Ashley N. ;
Palatnik, Anna ;
Ernst, Linda M. ;
Grobman, William A. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (04) :760-764
[2]   Isolated single umbilical artery poses neonates at increased risk of long-term respiratory morbidity [J].
Beharier, Ofer ;
Sheiner, Eyal ;
Sergienko, Ruslan ;
Landau, Daniela ;
Szaingurten-Solodkin, Irit ;
Walfisch, Asnat .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 296 (06) :1103-1107
[3]   ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan [J].
Bilardo, C. M. ;
Chaoui, R. ;
Hyett, J. A. ;
Kagan, K. O. ;
Karim, J. N. ;
Papageorghiou, A. T. ;
Poon, L. C. ;
Salomon, L. J. ;
Syngelaki, A. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 61 (01) :127-143
[4]   Perinatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Neonates Born With an Isolated Single Umbilical Artery [J].
Blum, Maayan ;
Weintraub, Adi Y. ;
Baumfeld, Yael ;
Rotem, Reut ;
Pariente, Gali .
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2019, 7
[5]   Long-term physical and neurologic development in newborn infants with isolated single umbilical artery [J].
Chetty-John, Shilpa ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Chen, Zhen ;
Albert, Paul ;
Sun, Liping ;
Klebanoff, Mark ;
Grewal, Una .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (04) :368.e1-368.e7
[6]   Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype [J].
Dagklis, T. ;
Defigueiredo, D. ;
Staboulidou, I. ;
Casagrandi, D. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (03) :291-295
[7]   Adverse perinatal outcomes following the prenatal diagnosis of isolated single umbilical artery in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Dagklis, Themistoklis ;
Siargkas, Antonios ;
Apostolopoulou, Aikaterini ;
Tsakiridis, Ioannis ;
Mamopoulos, Apostolos ;
Athanasiadis, Apostolos ;
Sotiriadis, Alexandros .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (03) :244-252
[8]   Isolated single umbilical artery: need for specialist fetal echocardiography? [J].
Defigueiredo, D. ;
Dagklis, T. ;
Zidere, V. ;
Allan, L. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (05) :553-555
[9]   Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformation: population-based study in Norway [J].
Ebbing, C. ;
Kessler, J. ;
Moster, D. ;
Rasmussen, S. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 55 (04) :510-515
[10]   Fetal megacystis: a lot more than LUTO [J].
Fontanella, F. ;
Maggio, L. ;
Verheij, J. B. G. M. ;
Duin, L. K. ;
van Scheltema, P. N. Adama ;
Cohen-Overbeek, T. E. ;
Pajkrt, E. ;
Bekker, M. ;
Willekes, C. ;
Bax, C. J. ;
Gracchi, V. ;
Oepkes, D. ;
Bilardo, C. M. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (06) :779-787