Spatiotemporal estimation of hourly PM2.5 using AOD derived from geostationary satellite Fengyun-4A and machine learning models for Greater Bangkok

被引:6
作者
Aman, Nishit [1 ,2 ]
Manomaiphiboon, Kasemsan [1 ,2 ]
Xian, Di [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gao, Ling [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Tian, Lin [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pala-En, Natchanok [6 ]
Wang, Yangjun [7 ]
Wangyao, Komsilp [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Minist Higher Educ Sci Res & Innovat, Ctr Excellence Energy Technol & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Satellite Meteorol Ctr, Natl Ctr Space Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] China Meteorol Adm, Innovat Ctr FengYun Meteorol Satellite FYSIC, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] China Meteorol Adm, Key Lab Radiometr Calibrat & Validat Environm Sat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Minist Nat Resources & Environm, Pollut Control Dept, Bangkok, Thailand
[7] Shanghai Univ, Sch Environm & Chem Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
PM2.5; AOD; Machine learning; Fengyun-4A; Performance evaluation; GROUND-LEVEL PM2.5; CHINA; AIR;
D O I
10.1007/s11869-024-01524-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study used four individual machine learning (ML) models (random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting), and a stacked ensemble model (SEM) for PM2.5 estimation over Greater Bangkok (GBK) during the dry season for 2018-2022. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) from Fengyun-4A satellite was used as the main predictor variable. The other predictor variables include meteorological variables, fire hotspots, vegetation index, terrain elevation, and population density. Surface PM2.5 from 17 air quality monitoring stations was used for model development and evaluation. Satellite AOD aligns reasonably well with AOD from two AERONET stations in the study area in terms of correlation coefficient (r), mean bias (MB), mean error (ME), and root mean square error (RMSE). Among the individual models, adaptive boosting performed the best with r = 0.75, MB = 0.55 mu g m(-3), ME = 9.1 mu g m(-3), and RMSE = 12.9 mu g m(-3). As for SEM which comprises all individual models, it outperformed every individual model, with r = 0.84, zero MB, ME = 7.2 mu g m(-3), and RMSE = 10.4 mu g m(-3). In two additional cases of haze hours and clean hours, SEM is best overall while adaptive boosting is superior to the other individual ML models. The case of haze hours has lower model predictability, suggesting elevated PM2.5 is difficult to predict. SEM was thus chosen to map PM2.5 as well as exposure intensity over GBK. Good agreement between the observed and predicted diurnal and monthly patterns is achieved by every model. PM2.5 tends to be relatively high at 08-10 LT and declines in later hours, corresponding to higher traffic emissions in the morning and daytime meteorological conditions more favorable to dilute air pollutants, respectively. PM2.5 intensifies in the winter but decreases in March and April. During these two months, the areas outside Bangkok tend to have higher PM2.5 than within Bangkok, possibly linked to active summertime biomass burning in those areas that are less urbanized with more agricultural lands. Relatively high exposure intensity is constrained to Bangkok due likely to its much denser population. The findings indicate a significant potential for leveraging the Fengyun-4A satellite data and ML to advance space-based air quality monitoring for Thailand and other data-scare regions in Southeast Asia. A satellite-based PM2.5 dataset could support the formulation of effective air quality management strategies in GBK.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1534
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   The influence of the open burning of agricultural biomass and forest fires in Thailand on the carbonaceous components in size-fractionated particles [J].
Phairuang, Worradorn ;
Suwattiga, Panwadee ;
Chetiyanukornkul, Thaneeya ;
Hongtieab, Surapa ;
Limpaseni, Wongpun ;
Ikemori, Fumikazu ;
Hata, Mitsuhiko ;
Furuuchi, Masami .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 247 :238-247
[42]  
Pollution Control Department (PCD), 2023, THAILAND AIR QUALITY
[43]  
Pollution Control Department (PCD), 2023, Annual Report 2022
[44]   Spatio-temporal modeling of PM2.5 risk mapping using three machine learning algorithms [J].
Shogrkhodaei, Seyedeh Zeinab ;
Razavi-Termeh, Seyed Vahid ;
Fathnia, Amanollah .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2021, 289
[45]  
Thai Meteorological Department (TMD), 2023, CLIMATE THAILAND
[46]   Short-term effects of particulate matter on outpatient department visits for respiratory diseases among children in Bangkok Metropolitan Region: a case-crossover study [J].
Thongphunchung, Khanut ;
Phosri, Arthit ;
Sihabut, Tanasri ;
Patthanaissaranukool, Withida .
AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2021, 14 (11) :1785-1795
[47]   Land use regression model established using Light Gradient Boosting Machine incorporating the WRF/CMAQ model for highly accurate spatiotemporal PM2.5 estimation in the central region of Thailand [J].
Thongthammachart, Tin ;
Shimadera, Hikari ;
Araki, Shin ;
Matsuo, Tomohito ;
Kondo, Akira .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 297
[48]   Estimating PM2.5 concentrations with statistical distribution techniques for health risk assessment in Bangkok [J].
Thongthammachart, Tin ;
Jinsart, Wanida .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 26 (07) :1848-1863
[49]   Intercomparison between satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass:: Implications for air quality studies -: art. no. 2095 [J].
Wang, J ;
Christopher, SA .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (21) :ASC4-1
[50]   Source apportionment and potential source locations of PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 at residential sites in metropolitan Bangkok [J].
Wimolwattanapun, Wanna ;
Hopke, Philip K. ;
Pongkiatkul, Prapat .
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2011, 2 (02) :172-181