Conceptual Framework and Content Validity for the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument 2.0© (C-CEI 2.0©)

被引:2
作者
Todd, Martha J. [1 ]
Manz, Julie A. [1 ]
Iverson, Lindsay [1 ]
Ball, Sarah J. [1 ]
Manning, Lucas [1 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
关键词
competency-based assessment; competency-based education; Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (C-CEI (c)); Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI (c)); validity; CLINICAL JUDGMENT; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; RELIABILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101467
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Nursing education is undergoing a transformational shift toward competency-based ed-ucation, necessitating psychometrically sound instruments to assess student competence. For the past 15 years, the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI (c)) and the Creighton Competency Eval-uation Instrument (C-CEI (c)) have gained national and international attention and utilized as assessment methods to evaluate competency.Methods: The purpose of this study was to revise the C-CEI (c) and establish content validity of the C-CEI 2.0 (c). Content validity was established through three content validity surveys, two focus groups, and an iterative process of data collection and analysis and tool revision.Results: Participants rated that each item was essential to be included (M = 3.70, SD = 0.53), was reflective of the category in which it was included (M = 3.70, SD = 0.57), and was easy to under-stand (M = 3.57, SD = 0.65). The overall mean of the three categories combined was positive (M = 3.65, SD = 0.59). Through an iterative process of conducting and analyzing findings from content validity surveys and focus groups, revisions were made, and the instrument was finalized.Conclusion: Initial findings suggest that the C-CEI 2.0 (c) demonstrates strong content validity. Cite this article: Todd, M.J., Manz, J.A., Iverson, L., Ball, S.J. & Manning, L. (2023, Month). Conceptual Framework and Content Validity for the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument 2.0 (c) (C-CEI 2.0 (c)). Clinical Simulation in Nursing , 85, 101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101467.(c) 2023 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Literature Related to the NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework [J].
Adamson, Katie .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 36 (05) :281-291
[2]  
American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2023, What is competency-based education?
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education
[4]  
Benner P., 1984, From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice
[5]  
Berman A., 2016, KOZIER ERBS FUNDAMEN, V10th
[6]  
Betts J., 2019, J APPL TEST TECH, V20, P21
[7]   Correlates of Student Performance during Low Stakes Simulation [J].
Burbach, Beth E. ;
Struwe, Leeza A. ;
Young, Lufei ;
Cohen, Marlene Z. .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2019, 35 (01) :44-50
[8]   New Nursing Graduates' Self-Efficacy Ratings and Urinary Catheterization Skills in a High-Fidelity Simulation Scenario [J].
Cason, Melanie ;
Atz, Teresa ;
Horton, Linda F. .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2017, 13 (02) :71-77
[9]   Effects of an Experiential Learning Simulation Design on Clinical Nursing Judgment Development [J].
Chmil, Joyce Victor ;
Turk, Melanie ;
Adamson, Katie ;
Larew, Charles .
NURSE EDUCATOR, 2015, 40 (05) :228-232
[10]   Integrating the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Clinical Judgment Model Into Nursing Educational Frameworks [J].
Dickison, Philip ;
Haerling, Katie A. ;
Lasater, Kathie .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2019, 58 (02) :72-78