Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study

被引:5
|
作者
Yachida, Tatsuo [1 ,2 ]
Kobara, Hideki [1 ]
Kozuka, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Nakatani, Kaho [1 ]
Tada, Naoya [1 ]
Matsui, Takanori [1 ]
Chiyo, Taiga [1 ]
Kobayashi, Nobuya [1 ]
Fujihara, Shintaro [1 ]
Nishiyama, Noriko [1 ]
Kondo, Akihiro [3 ]
Ando, Yasuhisa [3 ]
Okano, Keiichi [3 ]
Nonaka, Wakako [2 ]
Ishikawa, Kaori [2 ]
Masugata, Hisashi [2 ]
Masaki, Tsutomu [1 ]
机构
[1] Kagawa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Neurol, Kita, Miki, Kagawa 7610793, Japan
[2] Kagawa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Internal Med, Kita, Miki, Kagawa 7610793, Japan
[3] Kagawa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Kita, Miki, Kagawa 7610793, Japan
关键词
endoscopic knife; colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection; EARLY GASTRIC-CANCER; NEOPLASIA; TUMORS; RESECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12062329
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a grasping-type knife, called Clutch Cutter (CC), for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD). Methods: This was a randomized prospective study. Patients who underwent C-ESD for colorectal neoplasms >20 mm and <50 mm in size were enrolled, dividing into two groups: ESD using needle type of dual knife alone (D-group) and circumferential incision using dual knife followed by submucosal dissection using CC (CC-group). The primary outcome was the self-completion rate. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative complication rate, procedure time, and en bloc resection rate. Results: A total of 45 patients were allocated to the D-group and 43 to the CC-group were allocated. The self-completion rate was higher in the CC-group (87% [39/45] vs. 98% [42/43]). All of the six patients with an incomplete procedure in the D-group were completely resected with CC use. The intraoperative complication rate was not significant in either group (D vs. CC: 2% vs. 0%). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the D-group than that in the CC-group (62.0 vs. 81.1 min; p = 0.0036). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in the D-group and 98% in the CC-group. Conclusions: While dual knife use is superior to CC in terms of time efficiency, the use of CC may be a safe and efficacious option for achieving complete C-ESD.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scissor-type needle-knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
    Kalloo, Anthony N.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (09) : 846 - 847
  • [2] Hybrid Versus Conventional Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Short-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection)
    Yang, Dennis
    Hasan, Muhammad K.
    Jawaid, Salmaan
    Singh, Gurdeep
    Xiao, Yasi
    Khalaf, Mai
    Tomizawa, Yutaka
    Sharma, Neil S.
    Draganov, Peter V.
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (12) : 2436 - 2443
  • [3] Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Performance of a Novel Hybrid-Technology Knife in an Animal Trial
    Jacques, Jeremie
    Neuhaus, Horst
    Enderle, Markus D.
    Biber, Ulrich
    Linzenboeld, Walter
    Schenk, Martin
    Khalaf, Kareem
    Repici, Alessandro
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (21)
  • [4] Usefulness of IT knife nano for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal lesions
    Suzuki, Takuto
    Hara, Tarou
    Kitagawa, Yoshiyasu
    Yamaguchi, Taketo
    ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2016, 79 (02): : 186 - 190
  • [5] Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal carcinoid tumor using grasping type scissors forceps
    Akahoshi, Kazuya
    Motomura, Yasuaki
    Kubokawa, Masaru
    Matsui, Noriaki
    Oda, Manami
    Okamoto, Risa
    Endo, Shingo
    Higuchi, Naomi
    Kashiwabara, Yumi
    Oya, Masafumi
    Akahane, Hidefumi
    Akiba, Haruo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (17) : 2162 - 2165
  • [6] Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Primary and Recurrent Colorectal Lesions: A Single-Center European Study
    Spychalski, Michal
    Skulimowski, Aleksander
    Nishimura, Makoto
    Dziki, Adam
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (03): : 366 - 373
  • [7] Prospective, randomized controlled study evaluating a double-balloon interventional endoscopic platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)
    Kantsevoy, Sergey, V
    Palmer, Angela
    Hockett, Deborah
    Vilches, April
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 101 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [8] Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Hong Jun Park
    Su Young Kim
    Gwang Ho Baik
    Myeongsook Seo
    Hyun Il Seo
    Sung Chul Park
    Hyunil Kim
    Hyun-Soo Kim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 40 (1)
  • [9] Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial
    Andrisani, Gianluca
    Hassan, Cesare
    Pizzicannella, Margherita
    Pugliese, Francesco
    Mutignani, Massimiliano
    Campanale, Chiara
    Valerii, Giorgio
    Barbera, Carmelo
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Di Matteo, Francesco Maria
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 98 (06) : 987 - +
  • [10] Combination of water-jet dissection and needle-knife as a hybrid knife simplifies endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lingenfelder, Tobias
    Fischer, Klaus
    Sold, Moritz G.
    Post, Stefan
    Enderle, Markus D.
    Kaehler, Georg F. B. A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (07): : 1531 - 1535