Bidding against the wind: A choice experiment in green energy, green jobs and offshore views in North Carolina, USA

被引:0
作者
Parton, Lee C. [1 ,5 ]
Phaneuf, Daniel J. [2 ]
Taylor, Laura O. [3 ]
Lutzeyer, Sanja [4 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Dept Econ, Boise, ID USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Madison, WI USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Grootbos Nat Preserve, Gansbaai, South Africa
[5] 1910 W Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83725 USA
关键词
Offshore wind energy; Stated preference; Visual disamenities; Public goods; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PREFERENCES; VALUATION; FARMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119821
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Offshore wind development is in its nascent stages in the United States. Recent research indicates that the visual impacts of offshore wind farms are viewed negatively by the general population. This North Carolina application is the first US-focused discrete choice experiment that explicitly asks respondents to consider the positive local and global benefits from offshore wind development, such as job creation and greenhouse gas emission reductions, simultaneously with their visual impacts. We find significant willingness to pay (WTP) for reducing the visual impacts of offshore wind farms, and that the extent of disamenity varies in the population and with placement along developed tourist towns (as much as $783/year for three years) or preserved coastlines (as much as $451/year for three years). We also find that some preference classes value projects that create permanent jobs and reduce carbon emissions. We use our estimates of preferences for the positive and negative attributes to explore specific wind farm configurations and locations that could achieve positive consensus in a heterogenous population.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Preferences for Energy Efficiency vs. Renewables: What Is the Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions? [J].
Alberini, Anna ;
Bigano, Andrea ;
Scasny, Milan ;
Zverinova, Iva .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 144 :171-185
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Greenhouse gas equivalencies calculator
[3]   Valuation of ecological and amenity impacts of an offshore windfarm as a factor in marine planning [J].
Boerger, Tobias ;
Hooper, Tara L. ;
Austen, Melanie C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 54 :126-133
[4]   Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? [J].
Borchers, Allison M. ;
Duke, Joshua M. ;
Parsons, George R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (06) :3327-3334
[5]   Wind farm externalities and public preferences for community consultation in Ireland: A discrete choice experiments approach [J].
Brennan, Noreen ;
Van Rensburg, Thomas M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 94 :355-365
[6]  
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 2021, Kitty Hawk North Wind Project
[7]   Getting to 30 GW by 2030: Visual preferences of coastal residents for offshore wind farms on the US East Coast [J].
Cranmer, Alexana ;
Broughel, Anna Ebers ;
Ericson, Jonathan ;
Goldberg, Mike ;
Dharni, Kira .
ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 173
[8]   An integrated visual impact assessment model for offshore windfarm development [J].
Depellegrin, Daniel ;
Blazauskas, Nerijus ;
Egarter-Vigl, Lukas .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 98 :95-110
[9]   Understanding community acceptance of a potential offshore wind energy project in different locations: An island-based analysis of 'place-technology fit' [J].
Devine-Wright, Patrick ;
Wiersma, Bouke .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137
[10]   Do views of offshore wind energy detract? A hedonic price analysis of the Block Island wind farm in Rhode Island [J].
Dong, Luran ;
Lang, Corey .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 167