Indicators for the Evaluation of Science, Technology and Innovation Activities: A Systematized Review

被引:1
作者
Ortiz-Nunez, Roelvis [1 ]
Novo-Castro, Stephany [2 ]
Casate-Fernandez, Ricardo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pontificia Bolivariana UPB, Sch Social Sci, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Inst Informac Cient & Tecnol IDICT, Sci Direct, Havana, Cuba
关键词
Indicators; Science; Technology; Innovation; Research evaluation; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.5530/jscires.12.2.041
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The article aimed to develop a systematic review of the scientific literature about indicators for the evaluation of science, technology and innovation activities. For this, the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were used. Through the application of the SysteRe-HSS methodology, 96 publications were selected that formed the basis for a descriptive model of the science, technology and innovation indicators. The results of the research showed that there is a predominance of indicators related to the evaluation of innovation activities, human resources allocated to the activity of science, technology and innovation, financial resources and investments in research plus development, and indicators related to bibliometrics and scientometrics. However, challenges are faced related to measuring indicators of social innovation, linking insights from existing innovation measurement approaches with the essential features of social innovation, measuring the impact of social appropriation practices of science and technology, and the next generation metrics, responsible metrics and evaluation for open science, as well as alternative indicators for the evaluation of the social impact of research in web 2.0.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 458
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Abejon-Pena T, 2018, Span J Sci Doc, V41, pe200
  • [2] Measuring innovation: the use of indicators in developed countries
    Al-Mubaraki, Hanadi Mubarak
    Muhammad, Ali Husain
    Busler, Michael
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 11 (03) : 220 - 230
  • [3] A public administration oriented system of indicators for measurement, assessment, innovation and participation
    Alfaro, Cesar
    Gomez, Javier
    [J]. METHAODOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2016, 4 (02): : 274 - 290
  • [4] h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
    Alonso, S.
    Cabrerizo, F. J.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    Herrera, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) : 273 - 289
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, The Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, V3rd
  • [6] A science impact framework to measure impact beyond journal metrics
    Ari, Mary D.
    Iskander, John
    Araujo, John
    Casey, Christine
    Kools, John
    Chen, Bin
    Swain, Robert
    Kelly, Miriam
    Popovic, Tanja
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [7] Booth A., 2016, SYSTEMATIC APPROACHE
  • [8] Science and technology metrics for research policy evaluation: some insights from a Moroccan experience
    Bouabid, Hamid
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 101 (01) : 899 - 915
  • [9] Bund E., 2013, Blueprint of social innovation metrics-contributions to an understanding of opportunities and challenges of social innovation measurement. A deliverable of the project: the theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe (TEPSIE)
  • [10] Clavico-Alves M, 2017, Digit J Libr Inf Sci, V15, P324