Avoiding errors and complications related to immediate implant placement in the esthetic area with a mucogingival approach

被引:12
作者
Stefanini, Martina [1 ]
Rendon, Alexandra [1 ]
Zucchelli, Alessandro [2 ]
Sangiorgi, Matteo [1 ]
Zucchelli, Giovanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Bologna Univ, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Periodontol Unit, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dent Dept, Milan, Italy
关键词
bone augmentation; immediate implant placement; mucogingival approach; peri-implant tissues; soft tissue augmentation; SOFT-TISSUE AUGMENTATION; OUTCOMES FOLLOWING IMMEDIATE; FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; MARGINAL BONE LEVEL; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; SINGLE IMPLANTS; DEHISCENCE COVERAGE; CONNECTIVE-TISSUE; FULL-THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1111/prd.12491
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Immediate implant placement is considered the treatment of choice for single tooth replacement in the esthetic area. However, this treatment is associated with several critical drawbacks related to the inadequate assessment/management of the soft and hard peri-implant tissues and their subsequent remodeling, resulting in peri-implant soft-tissue defects that can lead to impaired esthetic outcomes in time. We describe in detail how the mucogingival approach to immediate implant placement ensures a standard result regardless of the baseline soft-hard tissue situation. Fully guided implant placement guarantees an adequate three-dimensional implant placement, the flap design makes it possible to perform bone augmentation with complete visibility of the area being treated, allows soft tissue augmentation with proper fixation of the connective tissue graft, and the placement of an immediate provisional ensures stabilization of the peri-implant tissues throughout the healing period.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 372
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation [J].
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Wennstroem, Jan L. ;
Lindhe, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (06) :606-614
[2]   Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[3]   Efficacy of different surgical techniques for peri-implant tissue preservation in immediate implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bakkali, Sara ;
Rizo-Gorrita, Maria ;
Romero-Ruiz, Manuel-Maria ;
Gutierrez-Perez, Jose Luis ;
Torres-Lagares, Daniel ;
Serrera-Figallo, Maria Angeles .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (04) :1655-1675
[4]  
Baldini N., 2010, J PARODONTOL IMPLANT, V29
[5]   Histologic evaluation of implants following flapless and flapped surgery:: A study in canines [J].
Becker, William ;
Wikesjo, Ulf M. E. ;
Sennerby, Lars ;
Qahash, Mohammed ;
Hujoel, Philippe ;
Goldstein, Moshe ;
Turkyilmaz, Ilser .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (10) :1717-1722
[6]   Alveolar bone resorption following coronal versus apical approach in a mucoperiosteal flap surgery procedure in the rat mandible [J].
Binderman, I ;
Adut, M ;
Zohar, R ;
Bahar, H ;
Faibish, D ;
Yaffe, A .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (10) :1348-1353
[7]   Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog:: flap versus flapless surgery [J].
Blanco, Juan ;
Nunez, Vanesa ;
Aracil, Luis ;
Munoz, Fernando ;
Ramos, Isabel .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 (07) :640-648
[8]  
Buser D, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P43
[9]   Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? [J].
Buser, Daniel ;
Chappuis, Vivianne ;
Belser, Urs C. ;
Chen, Stephen .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :84-102
[10]  
Campelo LD, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V17, P271