Target Engagement and Brain State Dependence of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Implications for Clinical Practice

被引:43
作者
Sack, Alexander T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Paneva, Jasmina [1 ]
Kuthe, Tara [1 ]
Dijkstra, Eva [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Zwienenberg, Lauren [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Arns, Martijn [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schuhmann, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Dept Psychiat & Neuropsychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Brain Nerve Ctr, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Brainclin Fdn, Heart & Brain Grp, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Neurowave, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Synaeda Psycho Med Ctr, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
关键词
THETA-BURST-STIMULATION; HOMEOSTATIC PLASTICITY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MOTOR CORTEX; INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; CAUSAL EVIDENCE; WORKING-MEMORY; HF-RTMS; TMS; OSCILLATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.09.011
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is capable of noninvasively inducing lasting neuroplastic changes when applied repetitively across multiple treatment sessions. In recent years, repetitive TMS has developed into an established evidence-based treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression. Despite significant advancements in our understanding of the mechanisms of action of TMS, there is still much to learn about how these mechanisms relate to the clinical effects observed in patients. If there is one thing about TMS that we know for sure, it is that TMS effects are state dependent. In this review, we describe how the effects of TMS on brain networks depend on various factors, including cognitive brain state, oscillatory brain state, and recent brain state history. These states play a crucial role in determining the effects of TMS at the moment of stimulation and are therefore directly linked to what is referred to as target engagement in TMS therapy. There is no control over target engagement without considering the different brain state dependencies of our TMS intervention. Clinical TMS protocols are largely ignoring this fundamental principle, which may explain the large variability and often still limited efficacy of TMS treatments. We propose that after almost 30 years of research on state dependency of TMS, it is time to change standard clinical practice by taking advantage of this fundamental principle. Rather than ignoring TMS state dependency, we can use it to our clinical advantage to improve the effectiveness of TMS treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 544
页数:9
相关论文
共 88 条
[11]   State-dependent TMS reveals the differential contribution of ATL and IPS to the representation of abstract concepts related to social and quantity knowledge [J].
Catricala, Eleonora ;
Conca, Francesca ;
Fertonani, Anna ;
Miniussi, Carlo ;
Cappa, Stefano F. .
CORTEX, 2020, 123 :30-41
[12]   OPINION The BCM theory of synapse modification at 30: interaction of theory with experiment [J].
Cooper, Leon N. ;
Bear, Mark F. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 13 (11) :798-810
[13]   Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in single and paired-pulse TMS data [J].
Corp, Daniel T. ;
Bereznicki, Hannah G. K. ;
Clark, Gillian M. ;
Youssef, George J. ;
Fried, Peter J. ;
Jannati, Ali ;
Davies, Charlotte B. ;
Gomes-Osman, Joyce ;
Kirkovski, Melissa ;
Albein-Urios, Natalia ;
Fitzgerald, Paul B. ;
Koch, Giacomo ;
Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Enticott, Peter G. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (10) :2639-2653
[14]   Brain Network Dynamics Underlying Visuospatial Judgment: An fMRI Connectivity Study [J].
de Graaf, Tom A. ;
Roebroeck, Alard ;
Goebel, Rainer ;
Sack, Alexander T. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (09) :2012-2026
[15]   State-dependent TMS of inferior frontal and parietal cortices highlights integration of grip configuration and functional goals during action recognition [J].
Decroix, Jeremy ;
Borgomaneri, Sara ;
Kalenine, Solene ;
Avenanti, Alessio .
CORTEX, 2020, 132 :51-62
[16]  
Deng Z-D, 2023, medRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2006.02.06.23285526, DOI 10.1101/2006.02.06.23285526]
[17]   Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Heart-Brain Coupling: Implications for Site Selection and Frontal Thresholding-Preliminary Findings [J].
Dijkstra, Eva ;
van Dijk, Hanneke ;
Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel ;
Zwienenberg, Lauren ;
Rouwhorst, Renee ;
Coetzee, John P. ;
Blumberger, Daniel M. ;
Downar, Jonathan ;
Williams, Nolan ;
Sack, Alexander T. ;
Arns, Martijn .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY: GLOBAL OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 3 (04) :939-947
[18]   Simultaneous rTMS and psychotherapy in major depressive disorder: Clinical outcomes and predictors from a large naturalistic study [J].
Donse, Lana ;
Padberg, Frank ;
Sack, Alexander T. ;
Rush, A. John ;
Arns, Martijn .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (02) :337-345
[19]   Static and dynamic network properties of the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation target predict changes in emotion regulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder [J].
Douw, Linda ;
Quaak, Mirjam ;
Fitzsimmons, Sophie M. D. D. ;
de Wit, Stella J. ;
van der Werf, Ysbrand D. ;
van den Heuvel, Odile A. ;
Vriend, Chris .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (02) :318-326
[20]   Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing [J].
Engel, AK ;
Fries, P ;
Singer, W .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 2 (10) :704-716