Deep learning model for measuring the sagittal Cobb angle on cervical spine computed tomography

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Chunjie [1 ]
Ni, Ming [1 ]
Tian, Shuai [1 ]
Ouyang, Hanqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Xiaoming [5 ]
Fan, Lianxi [6 ]
Dong, Pei [6 ]
Jiang, Liang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lang, Ning [1 ]
Yuan, Huishu [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hosp 3, 49 Huayuan North Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Engn Res Ctr Bone & Joint Precis Med, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Spinal Dis Res, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing United Imaging Res Inst Intelligent Imagin, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[6] United Imaging Intelligence Beijing Co Ltd, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep learning; Sagittal Cobb angle; Cervical spine; Computed tomography; ALIGNMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01156-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposesTo develop a deep learning (DL) model to measure the sagittal Cobb angle of the cervical spine on computed tomography (CT).Materials and methodsTwo VB-Net-based DL models for cervical vertebra segmentation and key-point detection were developed. Four-points and line-fitting methods were used to calculate the sagittal Cobb angle automatically. The average value of the sagittal Cobb angle was manually measured by two doctors as the reference standard. The percentage of correct key points (PCK), matched samples t test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient, mean absolute error (MAE), and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the performance of the DL model and the robustness and generalization of the model on the external test set.ResultsA total of 991 patients were included in the internal data set, and 112 patients were included in the external data set. The PCK of the DL model ranged from 78 to 100% in the test set. The four-points method, line-fitting method, and reference standard measured sagittal Cobb angles were - 1.10 +/- 18.29 degrees, 0.30 +/- 13.36 degrees, and 0.50 +/- 12.83 degrees in the internal test set and 4.55 +/- 20.01 degrees, 3.66 +/- 18.55 degrees, and 1.83 +/- 12.02 degrees in the external test set, respectively. The sagittal Cobb angle calculated by the four-points method and the line-fitting method maintained high consistency with the reference standard (internal test set: ICC = 0.75 and 0.97; r = 0.64 and 0.94; MAE = 5.42 degrees and 3.23 degrees, respectively; external test set: ICC = 0.74 and 0.80, r = 0.66 and 0.974, MAE = 5.25 degrees and 4.68 degrees, respectively).ConclusionsThe DL model can accurately measure the sagittal Cobb angle of the cervical spine on CT. The line-fitting method shows a higher consistency with the doctors and a minor average absolute error.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning model for measuring the sagittal Cobb angle on cervical spine computed tomography
    Chunjie Wang
    Ming Ni
    Shuai Tian
    Hanqiang Ouyang
    Xiaoming Liu
    Lianxi Fan
    Pei Dong
    Liang Jiang
    Ning Lang
    Huishu Yuan
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [2] DEEP SEQUENTIAL LEARNING FOR CERVICAL SPINE FRACTURE DETECTION ON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING
    Salehinejad, Hojjat
    Ho, Edward
    Lin, Hui-Ming
    Crivellaro, Priscila
    Samorodova, Oleksandra
    Arciniegas, Monica Tafur
    Merali, Zamir
    Suthiphosuwan, Suradech
    Bharatha, Aditya
    Yeom, Kristen
    Mamdani, Muhammad
    Wilson, Jefferson
    Colak, Errol
    2021 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2021, : 1911 - 1914
  • [3] Deep learning algorithm for automatically measuring Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
    Wang, Ming Xing
    Kim, Jeoung Kun
    Choi, Jin-Woo
    Park, Donghwi
    Chang, Min Cheol
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (11) : 4155 - 4163
  • [4] Sagittal Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis using total spine MR imaging
    Schmitz, A
    Jaeger, U
    Koenig, R
    Kandyba, J
    Gieske, J
    Schmitt, O
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2001, 139 (04): : 304 - 307
  • [5] Pearls for Interpreting Computed Tomography of the Cervical Spine in Trauma
    Darras, Kathryn
    Andrews, Gordon T.
    McLaughlin, Patrick D.
    Khorrami-Arani, Nivmand
    Roston, Alexandra
    Forster, Bruce B.
    Louis, Luck
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 53 (04) : 657 - +
  • [6] Application of deep learning in analysing morphological parameters of cervical computed tomography scans
    Li, Yuan
    Zhang, Enlong
    Ouyang, Hanqiang
    Liu, Xiaoming
    Pang, Huacheng
    Hao, Yating
    Hu, Daole
    Dong, Shuyu
    Shi, Xiangjun
    Tian, Shuai
    Dong, Pei
    Jiang, Liang
    Lang, Ning
    Yuan, Huishu
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 7 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [7] Application of deep learning in analysing morphological parameters of cervical computed tomography scans
    Yuan Li
    Enlong Zhang
    Hanqiang Ouyang
    Xiaoming Liu
    Huacheng Pang
    Yating Hao
    Daole Hu
    Shuyu Dong
    Xiangjun Shi
    Shuai Tian
    Pei Dong
    Liang Jiang
    Ning Lang
    Huishu Yuan
    Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology, 2024, 7 : 50 - 57
  • [8] Multidetector computed tomography of cervical spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis
    Koivikko, MP
    Kiuru, MJ
    Koskinen, SK
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2004, 45 (07) : 751 - 759
  • [9] Effect of Deep Learning Reconstruction on Evaluating Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis With Computed Tomography
    Ohtake, Yuta
    Yasaka, Koichiro
    Hamada, Akiyoshi
    Fujita, Nana
    Abe, Osamu
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 47 (06) : 996 - 1001
  • [10] Regional variations in the thickness of cervical spine endplates as measured by computed tomography
    Schmitz, B
    Pitzen, T
    Beuter, T
    Steudel, WI
    Reith, W
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2004, 45 (01) : 53 - 58