Extensive comparison of methods for removal of organic halogen compounds from pharmaceutical process wastewaters with life cycle, PESTLE, and multi-criteria decision analyses

被引:9
作者
Thi, Huyen Trang Do [1 ]
Fozer, Daniel [2 ]
Toth, Andras Jozsef [1 ]
机构
[1] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Chem & Environm Proc Engn, Environm & Proc Engn Res Grp, Muegyetem Rkp 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, Blgd 115, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Pharmaceutical process wastewater; Life cycle analysis; Multi-criteria decision analysis; PESTLE; Adsorbable organic halogens; Decarbonization; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; KRAFT PULP; AOX; EFFLUENTS; RECOVERY; SOLVENT; DEGRADATION; ADSORPTION; FRAMEWORK; TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118593
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recycling and disposing wastewater from the pharmaceutical industry are of utmost importance in mitigating chemical waste generation, where unmanaged hazardous waste fluxes could cause massive environmental damage. Air stripping, steam stripping, distillation, and incineration offer significant emission reduction potentials for pharmaceutical applications; however, selecting specific process units is a complicated task due to the high number of influencing screening criteria. The mentioned chemical processes are modelled with the Aspen Plus program. This study examines the environmental impacts of adsorbable organic halogens (AOX) containing pharmaceutical process wastewater disposal by conducting life cycle impact assessments using the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF), IMPACT World + Endpoint V1.01, and Recipe 2016 Endpoint (H) V1.06 methods. The results show that the distillation-based separation of AOX compounds is characterized by the most favourable climate change impact and outranks the PEF single score of air stripping, steam stripping, and incineration by 6.3%, 29.1%, 52.0%, respectively. The energy-intensive distillation technology is further evaluated by considering a wide selection of energy sources (i.e., fossil fuel, nuclear, solar, wind onshore, and wind offshore) using PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental) analysis combined with multi-criteria decision support to determine the most beneficial AOX disposal scenario. The best overall AOX regeneration performance and lowest climate change impact (7.25 x 10-3 kg CO2-eq (1 kg purified wastewater)-1) are obtained by supplying variable renewable electricity from onshore wind turbines, reaching 64.87% carbon emission reduction compared to the baseline fossil fuel-based process alternative.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe
    Achinas, Spyridon
    Horjus, Johan
    Achinas, Vasileios
    Euverink, Gerrit Jan Willem
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
  • [2] ALUCS, 2007, The AOX pollution reduction schedule of the central site of the pharmaceutical factory
  • [3] Guidelines based on life cycle assessment for solvent selection during the process design and evaluation of treatment alternatives
    Amelio, Antonio
    Genduso, Giuseppe
    Vreysen, Steven
    Luis, Patricia
    Van der Bruggen, Bart
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2014, 16 (06) : 3045 - 3063
  • [4] Distillation contra pervaporation: Comprehensive investigation of isobutanol-water separation
    Andre, Anita
    Nagy, Tibor
    Toth, Andras Jozsef
    Haaz, Eniko
    Fozer, Daniel
    Tarjani, Janka Ariella
    Mizsey, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 187 : 804 - 818
  • [5] [Anonymous], Ministry of Environment Regulation
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2004, ENCY ENERGY
  • [7] Argaw N., 2001, NRELSR50030383 PER P
  • [8] Arlt W, 2014, HBK SEPART SCI, P247, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-386878-7.00007-3
  • [9] Balioti Vasiliki., 2018, PROCEEDINGS, V2, P637, DOI [DOI 10.3390/PROCEEDINGS2110637, 10.3390/proceedings2110637]
  • [10] Recovery of ammonia from human urine by stripping and absorption
    Basakcilardan-Kabakci, Sibel
    Ipekoglu, A. Nursen
    Talini, Ilhan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2007, 24 (05) : 615 - 624