A critical review of methods, principles and progress for estimating the gross primary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems

被引:24
|
作者
Liao, Zhangze [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Binghuang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Jingyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jia, Hongyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fei, Xuehai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Engn, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Guizhou Karst Environm Ecosyst Observat & Res Stn, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Key Lab Karst Geol Resources & Environm, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ground observation-based GPP; model-based GPP; light use efficiency model; sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence; near-infrared reflectance of vegetation; INDUCED CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; LIGHT-USE EFFICIENCY; SOLAR-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE UPTAKE; GPP MODELS; FOREST; MODIS; RETRIEVAL; SATELLITE;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.1093095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The gross primary productivity (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems reflects the total amount of organic carbon assimilated by vegetation through photosynthesis per given unit of time and area, which represents the largest carbon flux in carbon budget and plays a fundamental part in the carbon cycle. However, challenges such as determining how to select appropriate methods to improve GPP estimation accuracy at the regional/global scale remain. Therefore, it is of great importance to comprehensively review the research progress on the methods for estimating the GPP of terrestrial ecosystems and to summarize their flaws, merits and application fields. In this study, we reviewed studies of GPP estimation at different spatiotemporal scales, and systematically reviewed the principles, formulas, representative methods (Ground observations, Model simulations, SIF based GPP, and NIRv based GPP) at different scales and models (Statistical/Ecological process/Machine learning/Light use efficiency models), as well as the advantages and limitations of each research method/models. A comprehensive comparison of GPP research methods was performed. We expect that this work will provide some straightforward references for researchers to further understand and to choose appropriate models for assessing forest ecosystem GPP according to the research objectives and area. Thus, critical and effective GPP estimation methods can be established for the terrestrial carbon cycle, carbon neutralization accounting and local carbon emission reduction policy formulation and implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of satellite-based models for estimating gross primary productivity in agroecosystems
    Jiang, Shouzheng
    Zhao, Lu
    Liang, Chuan
    Cui, Ningbo
    Gong, Daozhi
    Wang, Yaosheng
    Feng, Yu
    Hu, Xiaotao
    Zou, Qingyao
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2021, 297
  • [42] Evaluation of Envisat MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index-Based Models for the Estimation of Terrestrial Gross Primary Productivity
    Boyd, Doreen S.
    Almond, Samuel
    Dash, Jadunandan
    Curran, Paul J.
    Hill, Ross A.
    Foody, Giles M.
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2012, 9 (03) : 457 - 461
  • [43] Trends and controls of terrestrial gross primary productivity of China during 2000-2016
    Ma, Jun
    Xiao, Xiangming
    Miao, Renhui
    Li, Yao
    Chen, Bangqian
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhao, Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [44] Comparison of four light use efficiency models for estimating terrestrial gross primary production
    Zhang, Liang-Xia
    Zhou, De-Cheng
    Fan, Jiang-Wen
    Hu, Zhong-Min
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 300 : 30 - 39
  • [45] Estimating terrestrial net primary productivity over India using satellite data
    Chhabra, A
    Dadhwal, VK
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2004, 86 (02): : 269 - 271
  • [46] Patterns and controls of the variability of radiation use efficiency and primary productivity across terrestrial ecosystems
    Garbulsky, Martin F.
    Penuelas, Josep
    Papale, Dario
    Ardo, Jonas
    Goulden, Michael L.
    Kiely, Gerard
    Richardson, Andrew D.
    Rotenberg, Eyal
    Veenendaal, Elmar M.
    Filella, Iolanda
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2010, 19 (02): : 253 - 267
  • [47] A meta-analysis of primary productivity and rain use efficiency in terrestrial grassland ecosystems
    Yang, Zhongling
    Collins, Scott L.
    Bixby, Rebecca J.
    Song, Hongquan
    Wang, Dong
    Xiao, Rui
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 32 (02) : 842 - 850
  • [48] Responses of Terrestrial Ecosystems' Net Primary Productivity to Future Regional Climate Change in China
    Zhao, Dongsheng
    Wu, Shaohong
    Yin, Yunhe
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [49] Model of the net primary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems in china and its response to climate change
    Zheng, Y. R.
    Xie, Z. X.
    Jiang, L. H.
    Chen, L. J.
    Yu, Y. J.
    Zhou, G. S.
    Shimizu, H.
    PHYTON-ANNALES REI BOTANICAE, 2005, 45 (04) : 193 - 200
  • [50] Estimating soil pCO2 using paleosol carbonates: implications for the relationship between primary productivity and faunal richness in ancient terrestrial ecosystems
    Myers, Timothy S.
    Tabor, Neil J.
    Jacobs, Louis L.
    Mateus, Octavio
    PALEOBIOLOGY, 2012, 38 (04) : 585 - 604