A critical review of methods, principles and progress for estimating the gross primary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems

被引:24
|
作者
Liao, Zhangze [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Binghuang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Jingyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jia, Hongyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fei, Xuehai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Engn, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Guizhou Karst Environm Ecosyst Observat & Res Stn, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Key Lab Karst Geol Resources & Environm, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ground observation-based GPP; model-based GPP; light use efficiency model; sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence; near-infrared reflectance of vegetation; INDUCED CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; LIGHT-USE EFFICIENCY; SOLAR-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE UPTAKE; GPP MODELS; FOREST; MODIS; RETRIEVAL; SATELLITE;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.1093095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The gross primary productivity (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems reflects the total amount of organic carbon assimilated by vegetation through photosynthesis per given unit of time and area, which represents the largest carbon flux in carbon budget and plays a fundamental part in the carbon cycle. However, challenges such as determining how to select appropriate methods to improve GPP estimation accuracy at the regional/global scale remain. Therefore, it is of great importance to comprehensively review the research progress on the methods for estimating the GPP of terrestrial ecosystems and to summarize their flaws, merits and application fields. In this study, we reviewed studies of GPP estimation at different spatiotemporal scales, and systematically reviewed the principles, formulas, representative methods (Ground observations, Model simulations, SIF based GPP, and NIRv based GPP) at different scales and models (Statistical/Ecological process/Machine learning/Light use efficiency models), as well as the advantages and limitations of each research method/models. A comprehensive comparison of GPP research methods was performed. We expect that this work will provide some straightforward references for researchers to further understand and to choose appropriate models for assessing forest ecosystem GPP according to the research objectives and area. Thus, critical and effective GPP estimation methods can be established for the terrestrial carbon cycle, carbon neutralization accounting and local carbon emission reduction policy formulation and implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting gross primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems
    Williams, M
    Rastetter, EB
    Fernandes, DN
    Goulden, ML
    Shaver, GR
    Johnson, LC
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1997, 7 (03) : 882 - 894
  • [2] Evolution and Mechanism Analysis of Terrestrial Ecosystems in China with Respect to Gross Primary Productivity
    Sun, Hanshi
    Cheng, Yongming
    An, Qiang
    Liu, Liu
    LAND, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [3] Gross primary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems: a review of observations, remote sensing, and modelling studies over South Asia
    Pandey, Varsha
    Harde, Sakshi
    Rajasekaran, Eswar
    Burman, Pramit Kumar Deb
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 155 (09) : 8461 - 8491
  • [4] Estimating terrestrial gross primary productivity in water limited ecosystems across Africa using the Southampton Carbon Flux (SCARF) model
    Chiwara, P.
    Ogutu, B. O.
    Dash, J.
    Milton, E. J.
    Ardo, J.
    Saunders, M.
    Nicolini, G.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 630 : 1472 - 1483
  • [5] Climatic Drivers for the Variation of Gross Primary Productivity Across Terrestrial Ecosystems in the United States
    Chen, Yan
    Wang, Guiling
    Seth, Anji
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2024, 129 (08)
  • [6] Remote sensing of terrestrial gross primary productivity: a review of advances in theoretical foundation, key parameters and methods
    Zhu, Wenquan
    Xie, Zhiying
    Zhao, Cenliang
    Zheng, Zhoutao
    Qiao, Kun
    Peng, Dailiang
    Fu, Yongshuo H.
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 61 (01)
  • [7] Comparative assessment of leaf photosynthetic capacity datasets for estimating terrestrial gross primary productivity
    Xu, Mingzhu
    Chen, Jing M.
    Liu, Yihong
    Wang, Rong
    Shang, Rong
    Leng, Jiye
    Shu, Lei
    Liu, Jane
    Liu, Ronggao
    Liu, Yang
    Yang, Rongjuan
    Yan, Yulin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 926
  • [8] PRODUCTIVITY OF TERRESTRIAL ANIMALS - PRINCIPLES AND METHODS
    STRIGANO.BR
    ZHURNAL OBSHCHEI BIOLOGII, 1972, 33 (01): : 110 - &
  • [9] Effects of ecosystem types on the spatial variations in annual gross primary productivity over terrestrial ecosystems of China
    Zhu, Xian-Jin
    Qu, Fu-Yao
    Fan, Ren-Xue
    Chen, Zhi
    Wang, Qiu-Feng
    Yu, Gui-Rui
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 833
  • [10] ESTIMATING TERRESTRIAL GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY WITH THE ENVISAT MEDIUM RESOLUTION IMAGING SPECTROMETER (MERIS) TERRESTRIAL CHLOROPHYLL INDEX (MTCI)
    Almond, Samuel
    Boyd, Doreen S.
    Dash, Jadunandan
    Curran, Paul J.
    Hill, Ross A.
    Foody, Giles M.
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2010, : 4792 - 4795